Oppose This is the 3rd time the appointment is made. It should have been reported. Category and scope have been created for this occasion. This is not consistent with the spirit. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you found me!!!. I created this category a year ago, I carefully waited with my left mind to make this nomination!!. This statement, do not look too stupid?, if your premise is right this and this, and this and this and others cant be VI. by the way, in this picture is observed, the only food sustenance of this animal in the area. [1]. --The_Photographer (talk) 11:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The picture is very beautiful, but the question we must ask is this: what is what brings to VI. In the limit the scope "Portrait" might have been tempted; but I'm not sure that it works. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Concerning the image itself (independent from VIC): I think the composition could be improved a bit. Is this the whole shot, or have you already cropped it? Some more space at the left and a bit of crop on the bottom could move it more towards a "rule of thirds" composition … --El Grafo (talk) 12:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
