Commons:Valued image candidates/Khaled Said Graffiti on Berlin Wall.jpg

Khaled Said Graffiti on Berlin Wall.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	The Egyptian Liberal (talk) on 2013-04-01 14:04 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Khaled Mohamed Saeed, Street painting portrait.
Used in	Global usage
Reason	This image carries a great historical value. This image carries a great artistic value. One of the highest definition picture in its scope. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk)
Review (criteria)	* Comment A photograph (non eligible in "Commons") exists, and I think this design does not look like this young man was in real. So I think the picture here "does not illustrate the subject" well enough. Thoughts ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC) What if the scope was changed to include either "in graffiti art" or "in a mural"? -- Godot13 (talk) 00:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC) If the new scope is not good enough, it can be changed to Graffiti of khaled Said or Khaled Said Graffiti. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)  Support Looks good to me. -- Mina.naguib90 (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC) * Oppose Per my comment above.--Jebulon (talk) 20:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC) Scope changed from Khaled Mohamed Saeed to Murals in Berlin-Tiergarten -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 11:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". I'm afraid the new scope is not good at all... There are many murals in Tiergarten Berlin. Why chosing this one ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC) * Oppose Per Jebulon --Godot13 (talk) 06:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Scope changed from Murals in Berlin-Tiergarten to Khaled Mohamed Saeed, Street painting portrait. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Oppose No new argument. IT is difficult to have to vote every month for images already judged. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)  Comment OK form a new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)  Support Now the scope is good, the picture is representative of the scope, and the best in this scope. I support, and revoke all my previous comments or vote.--Jebulon (talk) 17:53, 1 April 2013 (UTC)  Comment This nomination has had three different scopes and none of the changes were properly noted... I have inserted the change of scope notations into the discussion and used the nominator's signature from the times it was changed. If this is in any way inappropriate, please undo my edit.--Godot13 (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC promoted Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)