Again with the elephant-head moth larva. This is the picture used on the en wiki. Not quite Featured Picture quality because the tail is not crispy sharp, but about the best high resolution capture of the real personality of this amazingly weird creature (if you could just see the teeth, it really is something else). Nominating as best in category. -- ~ R.T.G
Comment For VI it is decription that makes value. For a caterpillar in the final stage as here we must see the entire animal with the head and tail, especially the post-abominal horn. Here 69.016 BF1991 Elephant Hawk-moth, Deilephila elpenor, larva. (7858098418).jpg is a very good cnadidate to the scope that you have chosen. Other scopes are possible by reducing on a close up: the head, the paws etc ... The one that you propose the half of the animal is blurred and shows neither the head nor the tail.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's a technically excellent picture, just doesn't capture the fake head this thing has when it moves around in reality. That's what I was trying to put forward rather than simply the credit. But you're not wrong, every picture which captures the personality has an error, too small, or uneven focus etc. I think, when someone prepared to photograph finds one of these they move it or something. When I found one, I had a hand shears and was able to clip the whole stem it was on, but again the pictures I took of it have unflattering backgrounds and technically imperfect photos. Kind of funny :D ~ R.T.G21:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
