Comment The description doesn't refer to a city, it is referring to the Watermill itself, which is a listed monument (I hope it's clearer now, please comment if you have an idea to make it clearer). This picture is the same building from behind. Qoan (dis-me!) 08:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The scope was fine, I was referring to the description in the picture itself. It appears to only say the city it was taken in. That should be expanded. Other then that this looks good. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, because the form of the scope is incorrect. ":Category" is never shown in scopes. Please have a look at any other nominee's scope in edit mode and edit this scope accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Thanks for correcting the form of the scope, but I don't understand why this is the best photo in scope. How should we judge the various photos in the category? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
