Commons:Valued image candidates/Segestria bavarica male.jpg

Segestria bavarica male.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Alexis Lours (talk) on 2022-03-02 00:29 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Segestria bavarica, male
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment Clearly the best photo in scope, but File:Segestria bavarica.jpg is bigger at review size, so that gives me pause. Is that also a male? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)  Comment It is very clearly a male for the image which is proposed to us; for Segestria bavarica.jpg it's hard to see. The display would be more academic and of better quality if the head was up and the framing tighter on the animal. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)  Question Sorry if I'm misunderstanding. Do you mean a tighter crop would be preferable for Segestria bavarica male.jpg? As for Segestria bavarica.jpg, it seems to be a female individual given the seemingly shorter legs and the shape of what we can see of the left pedipalps. -- Alexis Lours (talk) 09:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Based on what both of you posted, the spider in the other photo is either a female or at least not clearly a male, and therefore, there is no question that this photo is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)  Support c'est bon pour moi; si tu avais laissé moins de blanc autour, qui n'a aucun intérêt, ton effet d'affichage aurait été décuplé. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)  Done Alexis Lours (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)