Question According to the guideline, does really this church need a scope ? It is only a question, not a decline vote. But the answer must convince me for supporting ! ;)--Jebulon (talk) 13:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Surely not ! But I'm not absolutely sure about your definition of the mission of the fr:inventaire général du patrimoine culturel... It' s an "inventaire général" (general inventory), and notices almost all a bit old... Very different of "Monuments Historiques", which this church is not (yet), if I'm not wrong.--Jebulon (talk) 22:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "répertorié à l'inventaire général" is not (and is less important than) "inscrit aux Monuments Historiques", which is not (and is less important than) "classé aux Monuments Historiques". In my humble opinion, this pretty church is not special enough to have its own scope, but I wont oppose here at the moment, lets discuss with other opinions ! Thanks--Jebulon (talk) 22:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is your point? You totally lost me here. My definition of the inventaire général du patrimoine culturel? I don't have a personal definition, it is a part of the French Minister of Culture (read the link, please). Why talk about monuments historiques? --Coyau (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
