I will eat my hat if Vaastr is not Vårin Strand or paid to edit. See this user created 2 article(s) on the no-wiki, uploaded her pictures(which gives -ve on reverse image search, most probably not copyvio) and most importantly did nothing other than that which means the purpose of this account was to create these articles. This user created these articles like a pro, I doubt he/she may have an another account. -- EATCHA (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One possible solution is to treat it as a free source in good faith, and if it turns out not to be, deal with a deletion request - at which point any promotions will be moot.--Peulle (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I also believe that it would be best to treat it as a free source in good faith moreover the reverse image searches shows that it's not a copyvio from anywhere on the internet atleast. -- EATCHA (talk) 11:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I fixed the scope. People notable enough to have an article in Wikipedia should have their own category. I suppose that is a studio shot, so geolocation is not needed, but it should be added in the description. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
