Comment Why? It's about the bike, the exact localtion of the background (reed, poster?) is irrelevant. The rough location is given in the file description, I cannot remember exact coordinates. --Centovalli (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the photo is on a neutral background, one can apply the fact that this is a studio shoot but this is impossible. The rule is that there was a geocoding. This point should not be insurmountable.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support After thinking about this one for a few days, I'm going to support it. The geocoding requirement has an exception not just for studio shots, but for "studio and other non-place-related shots". To me this is a non-place-related shot. The object of the photo is obviously the motorcycle. The uploader has told us that it was taken in Switzerland, but from what background we see here, this could easily be many parts of the US, and probably many other places as well. In other words, the background, and hence the location, is not really relevant to this image. All that said, I think it would be better (and a better image) if someone would digitally blur the background a little (that's beyond my photo editing knowledge), but not needed. cmadler (talk) 16:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
