Oppose for several reasons. First, it is customary to link to a relevant image gallery (page) or category for the convenience of reviewers. Looking through the relevant categories, it is very difficult to evaluate because images are not well (ha!) sorted. Second, this image is not geocoded, as required by VI rules. Third, the image description is minimal, which reduces the value. Finally, on a close examination of the image, it appears to me not to be wood at all, but some sort of cloth or fabric. Compare with File:Targowiska, studna.jpg, which is probably more suitable for such a scope. cmadler (talk) 17:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
