File:Factors in college life (1919) (14792891303).jpg

Identifier: factorsincollege00harw (find matches)
Title: Factors in college life
Year: 1919 (1910s)
Authors: Harwood, Hazel May
Subjects: Women college students Women college students Academic achievement Theses
Publisher:
Contributing Library: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
arcely be counted as she underestimated herself excursively on allbut one point. In Table 30, the final ranks of the students on the four factors and onthe composite are compiled from tables 19-27 into one table. Student A ranksIS in scholarship, 14 in native ability, 18 in student activities, 4 in sociallife with all round rank 15. The values from Table 30 are represented graphically in Chart IV. The students are arranged J, E B in order of composite ranks. The black line is for scholarship, purple for native ability, green for student activitiesand red for social life. 60 TABLE 30 J UlfasAJSnTs 14 ,—£Lg— £L^ £-4 B» Native Student Social Scholarship Ability Activities Life Composite A 18 14 18 4 15 B 20 20 20 10 20 C 6 11 10 7 9 D 14 8 12 2 10 E 19 19 13 3 17 F 2 3 8 20 7 G 11.5 17 19 15 18 H 4 6 4 16 5 I 15 16 17 9 16 J 5 2 2 1 1 E 9 7 9 8 8 L 17 18 16 18 19 H 7 12 15 17 14 N 13 10 11 14 13 0 10 1 6 12 6 P 8 15 14 11 12 Q 16 13 5 5 11 B 1 5 1 19 2 S 11.5 9 3 6 4 T 3 4 7 13 3
Text Appearing After Image:
U. OF 1. S. S. FORM 3 63 Correlations: TABLE 31 %nl with EM2 Scholarship with Native Ability r = .72 R! with Bw3 Scholarship with Student Activities r = .62 KMjwith H4 Scholarship with Social Life r =-.3l Rn2 with RM3 Native Ability with Student Activities r = .76 RM2 with Rn4 Native Ability witn Social Life r .-.11 R3 with E4 Student Activities with Social Life r « .06 . P.E. : .09 Interpretations:According to stuient estimates: 1. Scholarship varies according to native ahility. Very highcorrelation .72. 2. The better the scholarship the more prominent in studentactivities. Very high correlation .62. 3. The more extensive the social life the lower the scholarship. Thisis a large enough negative correlation to be quite significant (-.31). 4. The better the native ability, the greater the prominence in studentlife. Very high correlation .76. 64 TABLE 32Composite correlated with E with RM1 Scholarship r s .75 Rw2 Native Ability r = .76 Rw3 Student Activities r s .91 R4 Social Life r =

Note About Images