File:Fig 2. NDS example summary table.pdf
Original file (1,087 × 675 pixels, file size: 5 KB, MIME type: application/pdf)
Captions
DescriptionFig 2. NDS example summary table.pdf |
English: Summary table from the 2007 NDS comparing representation of women among faculty of different science and engineering disciplines. |
||
Date | |||
Source | Dr. Donna J. Nelson; she sent it to me personally | ||
Author | Brian Engel | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
|
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.htmlGFDLGNU Free Documentation Licensetruetrue |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 19:41, 20 October 2013 | 1,087 × 675 (5 KB) | Amada44 (talk | contribs) | converted to text by ocr | |
00:59, 19 August 2013 | No thumbnail | 0 × 0 (2.47 MB) | Brian Engel (talk | contribs) | {{subst:Upload marker added by en.wp UW}} {{Information |Description = {{en|This summary table provides, by discipline, the representation of women as a percentage of BS recipients, PhD recipients, assistant professors, associate professors, full profe... | |
23:18, 18 August 2013 | No thumbnail | 0 × 0 (2.47 MB) | Brian Engel (talk | contribs) | {{subst:Upload marker added by en.wp UW}} {{Information |Description = {{en|Summary table from the 2007 NDS comparing representation of women among faculty of different science and engineering disciplines.}} |Source = Dr. Donna J. Nelson; she sent it t... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | Microsoft Word - 07 report URMs 04Jan10.doc |
---|---|
Author | Donna Nelson |
Conversion program | ABBYY FineReader 8.0 Professional Edition |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 522 x 324 pts |
Version of PDF format | 1.2 |