File talk:Precession torque.jpg

 

Revision to description

Please see the discussion here: wikipedia:Talk:Axial_precession_(astronomy)#Cause for my justification for the revisions here [1] to the description. ErikHaugen (talk) 04:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Go ahead and fix it, if you want. But don't blank it; until it gets deleted, it needs to be available for use, and during a DR it especially needs to be available so people can evaluate whether or not it should be deleted.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Editors can easily see the old version during the DR. It needs to not be available for use, actually, since it is misleading. ErikHaugen (talk) 23:43, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Based on that theory, we could trigger editwars on half the maps in Commons. You do not get to blank an image just because you don't like it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Your maps analogy fails because there is no content debate here. Consensus is quite clear, see: wikipedia:Talk:Axial_precession_(astronomy)#Cause. Nobody is trying to promote this image. I'm not blanking it "just because [I] don't like it" - I think it's quite well done, in fact, it's just wrong and I don't want anyone to get confused seeing it. Can you explain why DR participants will have any trouble evaluating the picture if it is blanked? [2] - it's pretty clear what is going on here. I don't understand your concern. ErikHaugen (talk) 05:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

I have "fixed" it as you suggested, although of course it is quite ugly now; I don't have the skills or tools to do justice to this diagram. Hopefully we can leave it like this for now until the DR is complete. thank you, ErikHaugen (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)