User:Trödel/Permission from Jeremy O. Evans via email

Delivered-To: ...@gmail.com
Received: by x.x.162.6 with SMTP id k6cs402745hue;
        Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by x.x.22.2 with SMTP id z2mr33662579ugi.1168280978768;
        Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <...@gmail.com>
Received: from ug-out-1314.....com (ug-out-1314.....com [x.x.92.171])
        by mx.....com with ESMTP id 72si33308845ugb.2007.01.08.10.29.37;
        Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ...@gmail.com designates x.x.92.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u40so5467413ugc
        for <...@....com>; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:29:37 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:from:to:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id;
   b=pzMW49nHhK7qlqgK4/D2GDZMydU6sJ28Wks7BPyD/UR/s/PQ0BDswP2L2iPZ+jzHQ5m+8jrdiaLAJ6eg7cwhHP9d28UTAsAbz3aAMNZnrXaTJbsj06Pg9iiBUP1+ZULrR5ECJcfzK9jOyS6WfNf1eBvj2NJHeGGUIp203nZt1yk=
Received: by x.x.185.16 with SMTP id i16mr4167592huf.1168280977318;
        Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <...@gmail.com>
Received: from JOE ( [x.x.164.190])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 36sm26857967hub.2007.01.08.10.29.35;
        Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:29:36 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jeremy Evans" <...@gmail.com>
To: "'Jim'" <...@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e6ef262b0701080932m1a1168ebyc28a6a27ec720b10@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: lima
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:29:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01C73318.3FBA8AD0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: AcczSv0Vv8l5x8iSQraz0+bQufFsmQAA461g
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.5600.16384
Message-ID: <45a28d90.670cfa3b.48d2.ffffbabf@mx.google.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C73318.3FBA8AD0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sorry, I am an attorney, and should know better, but I have never worried
about the licenses on my personal photos.  If you would like to use that one
Lima temple photo, why don't you use it under a Creative Commons license 
cc-by-sa. You may use it for free for any purpose, and so can anyone else, 
as long as it is also used under a Creative Commons license.

Jeremy 
  _____  

From: ...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 10:33 AM
To: Jeremy O. Evans
Subject: Re: lima
...
In order for licensing to be clear, can you reply and choose one of the
licenses below that best fits your intent on granting permission to use the
photo. 
Free Use - The copyright holder of this image allows anyone to use it for
any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and
modification.
Public Domain - This file has been released into the public domain by the
copyright holder, its copyright has expired, or it is ineligible for
copyright. This applies worldwide.
Creative Commons license - Many available but these are useful and similar
to Flickr licenses
cc-by-sa - Creative commons - must be attributed and derivatives must also
be licensed cc-by-sa
...