User talk:Fastily

File:Pyeongchang 2018 Olympic official emblem.gif and File:PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympics.svg

Can you please deal with these? You restored the GIF in my unDR request because it's obviously too simple. Hektor doesn't understand that concept and has renominated it, as well as the SVG that was subsequently created. Fry1989 ^eh? 01:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY 07:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't understand what you did. This will end up like last time for Sochi 2014 by a letter from the IOC to the Wikimedia Foundation and the logo will be deleted. Do you really think that the Foundation has money to waste in a lawsuit with the IOC ? Hektor (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Excellent work, you just aptly demonstrated your inability to read a single letter of my closing statement. Have a good day. -FASTILY 07:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Do you act in the best interests of the Wikimedia Foundation in this instance ? I try to do so. Hektor (talk) 08:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Please be aware that Hektor has once again nominated these images for deletion. I have reported him for abuse at the Administrators' Noticeboard. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Sake barrels.jpg

Question about this image, which you deleted as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/packaing violation. Did Stefan mark it as a copyvio, and/or did you have other evidence to consider it a copyvio? There's a discussion at en:WP:AN about it, and I'm marginally confused by the DR — the nominator gave no deletion rationale, and while Stefan said that some were copyvios, he made no statements about individual images except File:出前一丁.jpg and the ones that you closed as "keep", which he said were examples instead of them being the only ones that were safe to keep. Unless he changed his mind and marked the rest as copyvios, I'm unclear about why you deleted all of them. Nyttend (talk) 03:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Did some research, thought about it, and at the moment, I'm inclined to stick with the close unless we get some new evidence regarding the artwork on the barrels. Here's a copy of the image. Is the design on the barrels is copyrighted? If it is, then we can't host it because it's definitely not De minimis. Otherwise, it should be fine for Commons, and I can restore it. -FASTILY 06:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

No complaint; I was simply asking for more information about your reasoning, not challenging your decision. Thank you, and I'll copy your message to en:WP:AN, since people weren't sure why you closed this specific image as delete. Meanwhile, I got a message from Stefan noting that the discussion was messy because it was so large and observing that it have been better to nominate them separately. If you have time, would you go through them and undelete any that you think aren't clearly copyvios? Upon finding that you've undeleted them, I'll create DRs for all of them, so that we can overcome the problems that Stefan notes. Nyttend (talk) 00:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello Fastily; I've re-uploaded the image to the English Wikipedia as I think our rules there will allow it. Can you tell me, though, do you know if the file linked above is full-size? If not, would it be possible to obtain a full-size copy of the deleted file? That would save it losing featured status if so. Many thanks. — Scott • talk 01:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

@Nyttend: Sure, I'll have a look at them later today.

Appreciate it; no need to notify me, since I'll check back. Nyttend (talk) 11:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

@Scott: Yup, that's the original version! I thought having the original file description page as a reference might be useful to you, so I've uploaded that here. -FASTILY 04:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks very much! — Scott • talk 10:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Email

Hello, Fastily. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

INeverCry 06:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Sajitha Madathil Images

Dear Fastly,

Please undelete the following files, as per Ticket 2013031410001184

• File:സജിത മഠത്തിൽ Sajitha Madathil 8826.jpg
• File:സജിത മഠത്തിൽ Sajitha Madathil 8823.jpg
• File:Sajitha Madathil with South african theatre friends.jpg
• File:Sajitha Madathil in Spinal cord.jpg
• File:Mother Courage-2004.jpg
• File:Matsyagandhi.JPG

WE can take a decison once we got a reply from the owner till that below files can be deleted.

• File:Sajitha Madathil in Shutter 2.JPG
• File:Sajitha Madathil in Shutter 1.JPG
• File:Adimadhyantham2-300x199.jpg
• File:Adimadhyantham ആദിമധ്യാന്തം.jpg

--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 10:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY 22:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Vandalic subtitles

Hello, Fastily. Can you also delete this subtitles? Thank you. --Ivanics (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done -FASTILY 22:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Half deleted?

File:Marissa Mayer at TechCrunch 2012 III.jpg appears to still have image information and upload info on it :) – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 00:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done. I restored it and re-deleted it. INeverCry 01:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 01:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Yvetterr

Hi Fastily, You recently closed Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yvetterr as "Deleted" without any explanation for your actions, while the opening argument for the DR was shown to be not true. The company in question is certainly notable with its products having en.wiki page. I request you to consider re-opening the discussion and to restore the files till we have more opinions. Thanks in advance. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Um ok, so you voted but it wasn't a vote? How interesting. -FASTILY 10:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your action. No, my vote was neither a keep nor a delete as my views are different for the two files, so I did not know how to vote for them. I feel that File:Metcalfe's Food Company logo.jpg can remain as {{PD-textlogo}} as it is a simple logo of a notable enough company, whereas I'm not sure about the notability of the other person even if he is/was the managing director of a notable company. I just asked to reopen till more people comment. Sorry if it caused you any inconvenience. Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for clarifying. -FASTILY 19:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

recent closure of undeletion request of File:SolarCell-IVgraph3-E.PNG

Hi Fastily, I saw at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests you recently closed the undeletion request of File:SolarCell-IVgraph3-E.PNG, guiding the user to OTRS. Did you notice that the requesting user seems to have claimed that 1) the picture was first published by him/her on Commons in 2006, and then reused by Siemens in 2009 (for which OTRS agents can/need to do nothing to add evidence), 2) the chart is not copyrightable because it is too simple. I personally find both of the two arguments convincing. Could you please at least re-open it and get more voice from the community? --whym (talk) 14:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

-FASTILY 19:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)