User talk:Guillom

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives:

Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cliff Simon - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 264.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cliff Simon - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 264.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Brigitte Lecordier - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 287.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brigitte Lecordier - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 287.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI by[edit]

Salut Guillaume, serais-tu opposé à la création d'une catégorie cachée Category:Quality images by Guillom ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Sans transition, poum poum. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Je note : quelques nominations en QI => compliments de la mort Clin Merci ! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Colin Cunningham - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 262.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colin Cunningham - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 262.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Carmen Argenziano - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 271.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carmen Argenziano - 2012 Sci-Fi Convention Toulouse 271.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Améliorations à apporter...[edit]

Bonjour,

Voici plus d'un mois, tu avais posé le problème de l'amélioration des relations entre les développeurs et les rédacteurs. J'avais posé une question :

Bonjour Guillom,
Il y a une chose qui me plairait bien. Si tu vas sur la page Josef Löwy, pour ne prendre que cet exemple, tu y trouveras une petite galerie de photographies et un lien vers la catégorie correspondante de Commons. Les photos de la galerie sont plus grandes, mais elles sont en double par rapport à ce qui s'affiche sur Commons. Le travail d'établissement de la galerie est par ailleurs assez fastidieux quand il y a beaucoup de photos (la page citée n'est pas la plus représentative à cet égard, seulement celle sur laquelle je viens de travailler).
Le rêve serait le suivant : lorsque l'on ouvre la page du photographe, les photos correspondant à la catégorie de Commons apparaissent immédiatement en bas de page, si possible dans un format paramétrable, par exemple 240 x 240 pixels, comme dans les galeries actuelles. Du coup le chargement devient automatique, ainsi que l'affichage des légendes des photos, quand il y en a, ce qui est généralement le cas.
Il se trouve que je passe en revue systématiquement tout ce qui est chargé sur Commons, depuis l'origine. Je suis sans doute un des seuls individus de la planète qui ont vu l'ensemble des images. J'en profite évidemment pour relever tout ce qui peut illustrer les livres dont je m'occupe. Cette modification me ferait gagner des dizaines d'heures !
Amitiés, Jean-Jacques MILAN (d) 15:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

En fait ce n'est pas la première fois que je pose cette question, mais je n'ai jamais eu la moindre réponse sur la faisabilité de la chose. Si tu as des éléments... Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Uploaded_with_UploadWizard[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Uploaded_with_UploadWizard has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

russavia (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Victor theme on the Wikimedia blog[edit]

Hi Guillaume,
I am not sure how to notify you properly of a commit that I suggested on github (you were not on IRC, and I am not sure whether you get e-mail notifications from github?), but I have just noticed that one <h1 /> tag is not closed properly in the archive.php file, which causes the live archives to break pretty awfully. I would appreciate if you accepted the commit I had suggested and pushed it to the live blog. Thanks, odder (talk) 00:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your message; you're right, I didn't see the notification from github. The blog's theme is no longer maintained on github, it's now in the Wikimedia repository (in /wikimedia/communications/wp-victor or some such). Feel free to commit your change there directly, and ping Terry Chay, the new maintainer of the theme, to push it live :) guillom 14:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Merged and deployed on marmontel, the blog host. Mutante (talk) 21:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear Guillom. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnsteltalk 23:31, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Demande de déblocage[edit]

J’ai découvert avec une certaine stupéfaction, pour ne pas dire une stupéfaction certaine, que j’ai été bloqué un mois (pas moins !) et sans aucun avertissement par le dénommé Dereckson qui n’a pas supporté que je corrige récemment une faute stupide mais très répandue - « en Avignon » au lieu de « à Avignon » - faute tellement répandue qu’il se trouve même des gens pour croire que « en Avignon » est la seule tournure correcte.

Il justifie mon blocage par des reproches qui m’ont été adressés en 2010 sur Wikipédia en français. Sans doute faudrait-il lui rappeler que nous sommes en 2013. De plus, depuis 2010, j’ai tenu compte des critiques de l’époque, ce qui explique qu’il n’y en a plus eu depuis.

Il affirme que ma ma page de discussion sur Wikipedia en français comporte plusieurs plaintes à propos de ce en Avignon / à Avignon. Il lui aurait suffi de lire attentivement les « plaintes » pour constater que ce n’étaient pas des plaintes mais des interrogations sur le motif de la correction ; qu’après explication mes interlocuteurs avaient admis que j’avais raison ; que si effectivement, il y a eu un litige avec un autre utilisateur, c’est parce que j’avais corrigé plusieurs « en Avignon » corrects (car cette tournure n’est pas forcément incorrecte) et qu’après discussion, nous étions tombés d’accord.

Il me reproche mon pseudo : attaque ad hominem.

Je me serais engagé dans une guerre d’édition : ([e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Promo_008.jpg&action=history]). Si Dereckson avait lu l’historique de l’article, il aurait constaté qu’au contraire, quand je me suis rendu compte que cela tournait à la guerre d’édition, j’y ai mis fin en donnant des explications complètes, à la fois sur la page de discussion de l’article en cause, et sur la page de discussion de mon interlocuteur, explications qui ont fait que celui-ci a cessé de « corriger » mes corrections.

Sur ma manière de répondre, voir ci-dessus.

Je ne prendrais pas en compte les conseils qui me sont donnés. Dereckson peut-il citer les conseils qui m’ont été donnés ? Hormis le message d’accueil, le message de Dereckson, suite au blocage, est le premier que je reçois !

Enfin, j’inonderais les pages de discussion avec des arguments « sans aucun sens ». Je vous suggère donc de lire une seule d’entre elles (toutes les autres sont identiques) afin de vous faire votre propre idée sur ces « non-sense arguments ».

Pour toutes ces raison, et devant l’inanité des motifs de mon blocage, je demande mon déblocage. Mon adresse IP actuelle est 84.246.217.25 et mon identifiant de blocage est 117876. (La procédure veut que l’on précise ces indications dans toutes les requêtes de déblocage.) Je vous remercie par avance.

User:Orthomaniaque

Message adressé aux administrateurs dont la langue maternelle est le français.

PS : Sur la page d’explication qui s’ouvre lorsque l’on veut modifier un article, la procédure de demande de déblocage est indiquée : il faut s’adresser à un administrateur. Et là, surprise : un utilisateur bloqué ne pouvant modifier une page de discussion, il ne peut donc pas demander son déblocage ! C’est pourquoi j’adresse ma demande sous IP, depuis mon téléphone.

Pour le cas où Dereckson, piquerait une nouvelle crise en voyant une nouvelle correction de faute d’orthographe effectuée par moi, pouvez-vous m’indiquer comment il faut s’y prendre pour demander un déblocage ?

thenounproject.com[edit]

Hey, I have seen that you have uploaded some of the noun project images. What about uploading all of them? Amada44  talk to me 19:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Source for File:Wikimedia-button-for-homepage.png[edit]

Hi Guillom, do you know where I can get an SVG, or otherwise good editable source file, for Wikimedia-button-for-homepage.png? I noticed you uploaded the most recent revision of this Wikimedia button. I am working on a prototype "portal" page for www.wikivoyage.org that has a background image instead of a plain light background. The standard Wikimedia button contrasts a little too much with the shaded part of the background image I have it on there. So I did a Wikimedia button there with a partly transparent background that lets it blend with the portal's background image more. However, it needs fine tuning (and of course Wikimedia Foundation branding approval). Do you know where I can get an SVG, or otherwise good editable source file, of Wikimedia-button-for-homepage.png from which to work? Thanks! --Rogerhc (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2013 (UTC) (I'm not at Commons much but I do check in at m:user talk:rogerhc).

Notification[edit]

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear Guillom. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 10:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Uploaded_with_UploadWizard[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Uploaded_with_UploadWizard has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

193.40.10.181 07:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit request[edit]

Guillom; I wonder if Seven-League Bot (talk · contribs) could make about 120 edits removing extraneous characters from location dec template parameters?[1] In each file, the character between the last coordinate digit and "|" should be deleted (two places). The file list follows (commented out to make this page readable). Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Chinese_New_Year_Parade_in_San_Francisco,_2010[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Chinese_New_Year_Parade_in_San_Francisco,_2010 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Escudo de los Condes de Luxburg.png[edit]

estimado usuario, mediante este mensaje le pido su coloración con respecto a un archivo que me fue objetado por supuesta violación de autor el cual es el escudo familiar de los condes von Luxburg y el cual estaba siendo usado en los artículos de los miembros de esta familia, el cual también esta siendo usado por la fundación de los condes de luxburg e aquí la pagina http://luxburgfoundation.com/index.html, yo personal mente participe en su edición y mejoramiento puesto que soy parte de la familia no entiendo porque me objetan de esta manera siendo parte de la familia puedo hacer uso de emblema familiar, le pido que me ayude porque e solicitado ayuda a otros moderadores y administradores y me han ignorado. gracias por leer el mensaje.--Von Luxburg (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Test tech news with MassMessage[edit]

22:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

[TEST] Tech News: 2013-49[edit]

08:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

[TEST] Tech News: 2013-50[edit]

08:08, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-01[edit]

08:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-02[edit]

08:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Multimedia vision 2016.webm[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Multimedia vision 2016.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martina talk 05:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Multimedia vision 2016.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Multimedia vision 2016.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martina talk 13:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-03[edit]

09:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Regarding File:Licensing tutorial en.svg[edit]

Hi there. I noticed that you are the author of the licensing tutorial for Wikimedia Commons, and I have some questions. I used to find myself consulting the tutorial often when I first began uploading images to Commons, and even added a line of text a few months ago to the page on copyright tags, but after awhile as my questions became slightly more complex, the tutorial became less useful to me, particularly with regard to what sorts of works can be considered public domain. I am thinking about putting together a graphic of my own, based stylistically on yours, titled something like "Maybe it is in the public domain", but I do not know how you went about getting your graphic added to the licensing page and wanted to ask about the procedure. I understand that the work was commissioned by the Wikimedia Foundation— is there someone there I might want to speak to about this? I still find myself second guessing my own decisions with it comes to uploading anything I did not personally create, and I think a graphic tutorial would be extremely useful (and not only for me!). Please let me know if you have any suggestions on where I might go to pursue this interest. Thanks!KDS444 (talk) 04:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-04[edit]

10:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-05[edit]

09:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-06[edit]

08:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-07[edit]

09:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-08[edit]

08:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Candy[edit]

Hi Guillaume,

I've got a question about File:Candy in the making in Nablus 027 - Aug 2011.jpg. Do you remember what kind of candy is being made? It looks very much like the traditional process for making comfits (sugar-coating little tiny things, usually bits of licorice root in the USA). WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

WhatamIdoing: Unfortunately, I don't know. We passed though it fairly quickly while walking through the city so I didn't get much details about what was being made. guillom 09:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-13[edit]

18:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-14[edit]

09:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-15[edit]

07:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-16[edit]

07:13, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-18[edit]

07:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-19[edit]

07:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-20[edit]

05:55, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Qt duck.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Qt duck.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-25[edit]

07:10, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-26[edit]

07:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-27[edit]

06:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-28[edit]

07:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-29[edit]

07:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-30[edit]

07:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Arrow[edit]

Dear Guillom, which program did you use to create the arrow in this image? I would like to do the same for the Vietnamese version of the guide. --Ngocminh.oss (talk) 11:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Ngocminh.oss: the arrow was added in a later version by PEarley (WMF), so you'll need to ask him :) guillom 08:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! --Ngocminh.oss (talk) 11:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-31[edit]

08:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Ceci peut-il être importé sur Commons ?[edit]

Bonjour Guillom,
excuses moi pour cette «intrusion» : je ne sais pas où poser ma question en français ...
Est-ce que ceci peut être importé sur Commons ?
Si oui, avec quelle licence ?
Mille remerciements d'un contributeur à la dérive !--Fguinard 15:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Fguinard: Bonjour. Malheureusement, cette image est sous licence « Creative Commons - Paternité. Pas d'utilisation commerciale. Pas de modification. » Ce sont les deux dernières conditions qui l'empêchent d'être importée sur Commons. Les images partagées sur Commons doivent en effet pouvoir être utilisées dans tout contexte (y compris commercial) et doivent pouvoir être modifiées. guillom 15:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Cher guillom : vraiment un immense merci pour cette réponse.--Fguinard 16:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-32[edit]

07:25, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-33 (Wikimania talk)[edit]

13:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-33[edit]

07:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

-Pete F (talk) 00:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Pete F (talk) 00:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Ah -- I should not have included this file in the mass nomination; I see that the metadata page does indeed include credits. (It would be better if the images were credited in the video itself, but regardless -- this is a different case from the others.) I am withdrawing this file from my nomination, sorry for the trouble. -Pete F (talk) 00:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Multimedia vision 2016.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Multimedia vision 2016.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

172.56.9.221 03:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear Guillom, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 19:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-34[edit]

07:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-35[edit]

09:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-36[edit]

07:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-37[edit]

09:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-38[edit]

08:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-39[edit]

08:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-40[edit]

09:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

File:07 Joady Lohr - Wikimedia Foundation 21.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:07 Joady Lohr - Wikimedia Foundation 21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALantz (WMF) (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-41[edit]

06:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-42[edit]

08:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-43[edit]

13:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)