File:Drawing (BM 1895,1214.1 2).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (1,600 × 1,231 pixels, file size: 281 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
drawing   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Title
drawing
Description
English: Head of a sleeping child; lying, head to right, wearing frilled bonnet. c.1740-42
Black and red chalk, with stump, heightened with white on grey paper, the upper left and lower right corners made up
Date 1740-1742 (?)
Medium paper
Dimensions
Height: 228 millimetres
Width: 270 millimetres
institution QS:P195,Q6373
Current location
Prints and Drawings
Accession number
1895,1214.1
Notes

This drawing is a portrait of Thomas Graham (1740 – 1741/2), son of the prosperous apothecary Daniel Graham (1695-1989), and functioned as a study for the group portrait ‘The Graham Children’ (National Gallery, London). Mary Webster suggests the commission for the group portrait of the children may have come in 1741 when Graham was rebuilding his Pall Mall houses, and the painting was completed in 1742. The youngest child Thomas died before the painting was finished, and although this drawing has often been called ‘Head of a Sleeping Child’, it was probably made by Hogarth on the child’s deathbed. Judy Egerton, in ‘National Gallery Catalogues: the British School’, provides the most extensive discussion of Hogarth’s ‘The Graham Children’ and the present drawing, quoted below:

“For his portrait of the baby, Hogarth almost certainly referred to a chalk study. The features of the baby in that study [the present drawing in the British Museum] bear a sufficient close resemblance to those of Thomas Graham in the oil to justify [Mary] Webster’s suggestion that his is a study of Thomas made for the group portrait. Webster, following Oppé, calls the study ‘Head of a Sleeping Child’. Binyon, who has catalogued the drawing in 1900 as ‘Study of a dead child’s head’ appears to this compiler to have been more perceptive. Hogarth’s study is close in feeling to Samuel Cooper’s chalk drawing ‘Dead Child’ and to the ‘Portrait of the Painter’s Son, Allan’ by Allan Ramsay at the deathbed of his fourteen-month-old son in 1740. The sense of unreal pallor and almost marmoreal stillness in Cooper’s and Hogarth’s drawing… is very different in mood from, for instance, Henry Moore’s studies of ‘Gus Asleep (in his boiler suit)'. Though there can be no certainty as to whether Hogarth made this study from a sleeping or dead child, it is difficult to account for this drawing (Hogarth had, by 1742, portrayed all manner of children without having to rely upon catching their features while they slept) except as a case of last resort, made because the Graham baby had died before ‘sitting’. Ten minutes’ walk would have taken Hogarth from his own house in Leicester Fields to the Graham’s house in Pall Mall to make this tender study. In the finished picture, Thomas is portrayed clutching a rusk, partly nibbled; possibly this symbolises the unexpectedness of death, which can take an infant as well as a man, ‘with meat in his mouth, that is suddenly’. (Egerton, The British School, p.139)

Further reading: Egerton, J., National Gallery Catalogues: The British School, National Gallery Publications Ltd, London, 1998, pp.134-45. Einberg, E., William Hogarth: A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings, Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, New Haven and London, 2016, pp. 242-44. Oppé, A.P., The Drawings of William Hogarth, Phaidon, London, 1948, p. 57.

Webster, M., 'An Eighteenth-Century Family: Hogarth's Portrait of the Graham Children', Apollo, September 1989, pp. 171–3.
Source/Photographer https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1895-1214-1
Permission
(Reusing this file)
© The Trustees of the British Museum, released as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Other versions

Licensing

[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.

This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current23:42, 10 May 2020Thumbnail for version as of 23:42, 10 May 20201,600 × 1,231 (281 KB)Copyfraud (talk | contribs)British Museum public domain uploads (Copyfraud/BM) Prints by William Hogarth in the British Museum 1740 image 3 of 3 #81/1,429

The following page uses this file:

Metadata