File:Endorsing and encouraging the "Third System".jpg
Original file (1,711 × 1,369 pixels, file size: 471 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionEndorsing and encouraging the "Third System".jpg |
English: 30 March 2012. The purple bags await collection. They were left by street cleaners working for Veolia - Haringey's waste and recycling contractors. Black and other coloured bags are likely to have been dumped by local residents and traders, who assume the whole lot will get picked up.
For several years I've complained about this spot being used as an informal pick-up point for dumped rubbish. What's now happening makes this problem worse. The purple bags act as a magnet for more rubbish. They implicitly endorse and approve the dumping. This is what I've called the Third System. For most residents the first system is the collection of waste from people's homes or businesses - from wheeled bins, recycling boxes, bags of garden and food waste, etc. The second system is when residents bring waste to the Reuse and Recycling Centres or other "bring" sites such as bottle and paper banks. Parallel to these, there's an informal third system - when waste is dumped on the street, in an alley, or corner of a park, etc at any time, day or night. With the expectation that it will be collected by someone. Perhaps the dumpers know Veolia will eventually remove it. Perhaps they have a vague idea that "the Council" will do it. Or maybe they don't give it any thought, but simply assume that an anonymous invisible 'them' will come round to clean the street. Veolia's accumulated piles of purple bags encourage this informal Third System. We may as well have a large sign saying: Please forget your wheelie bin. Don't bother taking stuff to the Reuse & Recycling Centres. Just leave it here. We'll collect it. Sooner or (probably) later. Unless and until Haringey admits and finds effective ways to solve this problem - including changing people's behaviour - for the foreseeable future some people will continue to use our streets as dumping sites. _____________________________ § See where this picture was taken. § Examples of the Third System. § Examples of litter bins as pick-up points. § 'I' is for Imitation. Examples of how litter and dumping "models" public behaviour. |
Date | |
Source | https://www.flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/6895854664/ |
Author | Alan Stanton |
Camera location | 51° 35′ 27.63″ N, 0° 04′ 08″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 51.591007; -0.068888 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Alan Stanton at https://flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/6895854664. It was reviewed on 23 December 2021 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
23 December 2021
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 09:00, 23 December 2021 | 1,711 × 1,369 (471 KB) | Oxyman (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Alan Stanton from https://www.flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/6895854664/ with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot S95 |
Exposure time | 1/640 sec (0.0015625) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 80 |
Date and time of data generation | 15:28, 30 March 2012 |
Lens focal length | 0.0048331744303214 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
File change date and time | 14:52, 3 April 2012 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 15:28, 30 March 2012 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 9.3125 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.96875 APEX (f/2.8) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, auto mode |
IIM version | 2 |