File:Planetary nebula M76 (NGC 650 and NGC 651) (noao-m76).jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 600 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 240 × 240 pixels | 480 × 480 pixels | 850 × 850 pixels.
Original file (850 × 850 pixels, file size: 124 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionPlanetary nebula M76 (NGC 650 and NGC 651) (noao-m76).jpg |
English: This is a two-minute exposure taken on the night of September 1st 1994 (UT of observation 02/09/94:07:20). This photograph shows a region 170 arc seconds square which has been compressed in brightness (approximately a double logarithm) to show both bright and faint features. Observing conditions during this phase of the commissioning were not ideal, but this image has a "seeing" measurement (average FWHM of several stars) of about 0.9 arc seconds. The image has not been re-oriented to remove either the CCD orientation or the field rotation of the altitude-azimuth design of the WIYN telescope: NW is up, SE to the right. About this object The planetary nebula M76 was given two NGC numbers because Herschel believed it to be an unresolved double nebula. It is one of the faintest Messier objects, with an integrated visual magnitude fainter than 12 and generally low surface brightness. The sharp edges of the central rectangular portion contrast with the large wisp-like extensions appearing as two overlapping ellipses centered on the short axis of the rectangle. The central star is still visible at a photographic magnitude of 16.5, and is variously sized from 0.6 solar masses to 0.9 solar masses at temperatures from below 100,000K to above 170,000K. Combining the observed morphology with measurements of the velocity field across the nebula, it becomes quite difficult to construct a physical model for just how this central star ejected its envelope. The two current best suggestions are a double coaxial toroid, and a distorted double coaxial toroid on the surface of a cone. Both models have some trouble reproducing both the surface brightness variations and the velocity structure, but the conical model is slightly better. Conical ejection could be due to rotation of the stellar envelope, to preferential ejection along the magnetic poles of an oblique rotator, to the structure of the extended pre-planetary phase being frozen-in, or even to the effect of a common-envelope close binary. Clearly, an explanation is not yet forthcoming, and M76 continues to be one of the more interesting and attractive planetary nebulae in the sky. Location: 01 38.8 +57 19 (1950.0), distance: about 2500 light-years, Size: about 0.7 light-years across. |
Date | 30 June 2020, 21:34:00 (upload date) |
Source | Planetary nebula M76 (NGC 650 and NGC 651) |
Author | D.Sawyer, A.McDonald/WIYN/NOIRLab/NSF |
Other versions |
|
Licensing
[edit]This media was created by the National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory (NOIRLab).
Their website states: "Unless specifically noted, the images, videos, and music distributed on the public NOIRLab website, along with the texts of press releases, announcements, images of the week and captions; are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, and may on a non-exclusive basis be reproduced without fee provided the credit is clear and visible." To the uploader: You must provide a link (URL) to the original file and the authorship information if available. | |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:53, 17 September 2023 | 850 × 850 (124 KB) | OptimusPrimeBot (talk | contribs) | #Spacemedia - Upload of https://noirlab.edu/public/media/archives/images/large/noao-m76.jpg via Commons:Spacemedia |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Image title |
|
---|---|
Credit/Provider | D.Sawyer, A.McDonald/WIYN/NOIRLAB/NSF |
Short title |
|
Date and time of data generation | 21:34, 30 June 2020 |
Keywords |
|
Contact information |
None None, None, None None |
IIM version | 4 |