File:Pluto bladed stereo.jpg
Original file (855 × 582 pixels, file size: 852 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
DescriptionPluto bladed stereo.jpg |
English: One of the strangest landforms spotted by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft when it flew past Pluto last July was the "bladed" terrain just east of Tombaugh Regio, the informal name given to Pluto's large heart-shaped surface feature.
The blades are the dominant feature of a broad area informally named Tartarus Dorsa. They align from north to south, reach hundreds of feet high and are typically spaced a few miles apart. This remarkable landform, unlike any other seen in our solar system, is perched on a much broader set of rounded ridges that are separated by flat valley floors. This amazing stereo view combines two images from the Ralph/Multispectral Visible Imaging Camera (MVIC) taken about 14 minutes apart on July 14, 2015. The first was taken when New Horizons was 16,000 miles (25,000 kilometers) away from Pluto, the second when the spacecraft was 10,000 miles (about 17,000 kilometers) away. Best resolution is approximately 1,000 feet (310 meters). |
||||||
Date | |||||||
Source | http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/Multimedia/Science-Photos/pics/Pluto_bladed_stereo.jpg | ||||||
Author | NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute | ||||||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 11:14, 1 April 2016 | 855 × 582 (852 KB) | PlanetUser (talk | contribs) | Transferred from http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/Multimedia/Science-Photos/pics/Pluto_bladed_stereo.jpg |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Width | 5,801 px |
---|---|
Height | 5,401 px |
Bits per component |
|
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh |
File change date and time | 20:11, 21 March 2016 |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Color space | Uncalibrated |
Image width | 855 px |
Image height | 582 px |
Unique ID of original document | F138CC019541FC9C0566823D780CF5C5 |
Date and time of digitizing | 13:11, 21 March 2016 |
Date metadata was last modified | 13:11, 21 March 2016 |
IIM version | 64,458 |