File:The V- (victualling) committee framing a report. (BM 1868,0808.4869 1).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(1,600 × 493 pixels, file size: 185 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

The V- [victualling] committee framing a report.   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Title
The V- [victualling] committee framing a report.
Description
English: Members of a parliamentary committee seated round an oblong table; two tiers of raised seats are on the farther side of the table, in the centre of the upper tier sits the chairman, immediately below him the clerk of the committee is 'framing' the Report. This is the Committee appointed to examine the conduct nominally of the Navy Victualling Board, actually that of Christopher Atkinson, a corn factor of Mark Lane, M.P. for Heydon, employed by the Board to purchase malt, &c. on commission, who was accused of cheating by overcharges and false accounts. He had been attacked by letters in the 'General Advertiser', at first anonymously, and then from Oct. 1780 by one Bennett. In Feb. 1781 he was dismissed by the Board, in the same month he brought an action for libel against Bennett. Pie did not produce his books to the Board as requested and in the winter of 1781-2 burned them. The Committee sat from 7 Mar. 1782 to 25 June 1782 and examined members of the Victualling Board.


The persons in the print are portraits, and are indicated by numbers, but any explanatory notes there may have been are missing. With the print was issued a 'New Song' of which there is a MS. copy. [Printed in Wright & Evans, pp. 11-13, “from a unique impression in the possession of Mr. George Fores.”]
The Chairman (left) (Samuel Whitbread) is saying, “This is certainly the first instance of an accused Man sitting as Judge on his own Cause and requires particular attention.” The clerk (2) is writing; he says, “The Man who ventured to hold forth such Malpractices, has rendered his Country service”. A man (3) standing on the right of the Chairman, who from the Song appears to be Montague Burgoyne of the Victualling Office, is saying, “His whole defence rests on the proof of his Partners & Clerk, & such Evidence should be cautiously trusted, they being interested”. No 4, on the left of the Chairman, evidently one of the seven Commissioners of the Victualling Office, is saying, “ He has behaved so well to us that we must endeavour to bring him through, but the burning his Books is the greatest preventative”. No. 5, seated on the right of the clerk, is saying, “Such infamous overcharges besides 3500£ a year, deserves the severest punishment”. No. 6, on the clerk's right, says, holding down his head, “We must be tender, we may be in the same situation at a future time, then this will appear as a precedent”. No. 7, on the right of the middle tier, has two faces, one in profile to the left, the other to the right. One says, “He has much Money, that is what I deal in. I must be tender”; the other says, “I must carry appearances against him to please the Public”. Probably Bamber Gascoyne, Junior, the two faces being an allusion to his house 'Bifrons' at Barking, which had two fronts, see BMSat6056; see “infra” the words spoken by No. 14. The next four are seated on the farther side of the table, immediately under the two upper tiers of seats: No. 8 (left) says, clasping his hands and raising his eyes, “Oh Heavens, what can we expect of the Man who burns his Books & denies his Affidavit?” (That is, in his libel action against Bennett, where he swore that he charged no more for his purchases for the Victualling Board than the prices he paid.) His neighbour (9) is saying, “The great overcharge on the 250: I Malt at Plymouth, should not escape our notice”. No. 10 turns to his neighbour on the right. saying, “You must instruct me for his Interest, I have a refreshing Fee for You”. No. 11 answers him, “This damn'd Affidavit entirely oversets us! - But still we can't leave him”; he is pointing to a paper which he holds in front of him inscribed, “Kings Bench . . . C.A.”, representing the affidavit in question.
No. 12, evidently Atkinson himself, is standing up at the right end of the table, in profile to the left, his hand on his breast, looking towards the clerk; he says, “Upon my Honor & Reputation notwithstanding the Charges against me, I served them with Industry and Sometimes with Integrity”. The next two are seated at the right end of the table, both in profile to the left. No. 13 (next Atkinson) says, pointing to No. 11, “The getting him upon the Committee was a noble stroke, we can now leave out the Evidence that affects him, as we have a Majority”. The man next him, without a number, sits with a book on the table in front of him inscribed “Letter, Scourge, W. Bennett, C. A.”, evidently containing the Press attacks on Atkinson. He is saying, “Suppressing Evidence so material to the Enquiry & deliver'd by such unimpeachable Characters, must deserve Censure.”
The next six sit, right to left, on the nearer side of the table facing the chairman. No. 14, with a pen in his hand and papers in front of him, is saying, “The Quibbles used by Bam [Bamber Gascoyne] are intended to tire out the Committee”. No. 15, evidently one of the Commissioners of the Victualling Office, says, “The letter we gave him was intended to do him honour, & should have contented him after detection”. No. 16 says, “The overcharges did not affect us, & I wish the Fellow damn'd that first made them public, I feel the loss of presents”. No. 17 says to No. 16, “A very decent account of overcharge in which he bot of one Person”; he is holding in his hand a paper inscribed “Flour 1300 at Is, 826 at 2. 300(?) at 9, 10, 11 . . .” No. 18 says, turning to No. 19, “We did not dismiss or accuse him till an instance was clearly traced out & proved of his not having done Justice to the Crown”. No. 19 answers, “We thought him to be our confidential Servant”. Nos. 20 and 21 sit at the 1. end of the table; 20 says, “This Burning Books seems to be a concerted plan between his Lighterman & himself, to prevent detection, as every other Person in the Trade preserve theirs.” 12 August 1782


Etching
Depicted people Representation of: Bamber Gascoyne
Date 1782
date QS:P571,+1782-00-00T00:00:00Z/9
Medium paper
Dimensions

Height: 254 millimetres

Width: 357 millimetres
institution QS:P195,Q6373
Current location
Prints and Drawings
Accession number
1868,0808.4869
Notes

(Description and comment from M.Dorothy George, 'Catalogue of Political and Personal Satires in the British Museum', V, 1935) In October 1782 Atkinson was indicted for perjury, as a result of the inquiries of the Victualling Committee. He was eventually tried and found guilty in the King's Bench before Mansfield on 15 July 1783. He was expelled from the House of Commons 4 Dec. 1784 and afterwards stood in the pillory, 25 Nov. 1785. This print appears to amalgamate the proceedings of the Commissioners of the Victualling Office with those of the Parliamentary Committee whose names are given in the ‘Commons' Journal’, vol. 38, pp. 871-2, 895, 1000. Nos. 3, 14, 15, 16, 18 and 19 are evidently Commissioners of the Victualling Board; these were Jonas Hanway, A. Chorley, Joah Bates, James Kirke, John Slade, William Lance, and Montague Burgoyne. The print is further explained by the song, “The V------ Committee. A new song of the year 1782”: in this “Bam” (Bamber Gascoyne), “Air” (Anthony Eyre, M.P. for Borough Bridge, or Francis Eyre, M.P. for Great Grimsby), and K**ke (James Kirke) are accused of shielding Atkinson. “Sir Philip” (Jennings Clerke) is praised for his honesty. The affair produced a considerable literature in the years 1784-5, see B. M. L. Catalogue. See also Walpole, ‘Last Journals’, 1910, ii. 259, 410. There are several prints of Atkinson in the pillory. Grego, ‘Gillray’, p. 41. Wright and Evans, No. 10.

(Supplementary information)

Accompanying the print (now detached) is a manuscript New Song.
Source/Photographer https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1868-0808-4869
Permission
(Reusing this file)
© The Trustees of the British Museum, released as CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Other versions

Licensing[edit]

This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).


This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current09:16, 6 May 2020Thumbnail for version as of 09:16, 6 May 20201,600 × 493 (185 KB)Copyfraud (talk | contribs)British Museum public domain uploads (Copyfraud/BM) Satirical prints in the British Museum 1782 image 2 of 2 #46

Metadata