File talk:Escitalopram-skeletal.png

来自Wikimedia Commons
跳转到导航 跳转到搜索

Sorry, I didn't notice the dispute tag until Leyo informed me.

I think the tag has been used inappropriately in this case. Non-wedged hashed bonds may be deprecated by IUPAC but they remain acceptable where there is no ambiguity - certainly no reason to delete: (Graphical Representation of Stereochemical Configuration IUPAC Recommendations 2006). Nevertheless, I think wedged hashed bonds are better so I've provided a new image in this style: File:Escitalopram-2D-skeletal-A.png. Is this what you were asking for, Cacycle?: File:Escitalopram-2D-skeletal-B.png

Having a bold wedged bond and a hashed wedged bond emanating from one carbon is formally redundant in this case, but it is the way escitalopram is usually depicted in the literature. See examples A and B. On that basis, I think the image should stay as it is.

Ben (talk) 11:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[回复]