File talk:Fano plane with nimber labels.svg

出典:ウィキメディア・コモンズ (Wikimedia Commons)
ナビゲーションに移動 検索に移動

Arrangement[編集]

Hi. Do you prefer the present arrangement of the numbers for some reason?
If not I would like to replace it by the following:

            2                                                    010
   

       3         6                                         011         110
            7                                                    111

  1         5         4                              001         101        100

The binary representation would be symmetrical, and it would correspond to

where the vertices are numbered by the correspondence with .

Greetings, Watchduck (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[返信]

Your arrangement is isomorphic to the present one; pictorially it corresponds to a reflection along the line 3–7–4. I see no clear reason to prefer one isomorphic presentation over another one. As the vertices in the Fano plane in the Hasse diagram are not numbered, I don't see the correspondence as an argument. What is the point of that diagram anyway? The middle two layers show that the Fano plane is self-dual, but in that context the top and bottom layers are only visual noise.  --Lambiam 20:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[返信]
The third Hasse diagram: Lattice of subgroups of Z23

When I have to choose a random presentation I always choose symmetry. That's why I mentioned the binary numbers. The enumeration of the vertices in the Hasse diagram is not shown, because that wouldn't be readable - but the other two Hasse diagrams don't leave a choice for their enumeration. They are also the reason, that the top and the bottom vertex are shown. I wouldn't make a Hasse diagram of a lattice of subgroups without the group itself on the top and the trivial group on the bottom. And I make corresponding files as similar as possible.
I don't want to use contradicting files together, so I would upload a Fano plane that corresponds with my other files. But before I wanted to ask, if we can change this one instead. That's all. Greetings, Watchduck (talk) 23:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[返信]