File talk:Michelangelo Caravaggio 038.jpg
From: Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Image:Michelangelo_Caravaggio_038.jpg
- Image file: Image:Michelangelo_Caravaggio_038.jpg
- Deletion reason: Dupe of Image:Caravaggio-Crucifixion of Peter.jpg
- Deleter: User:Siebrand
- Undeletion Reason: the image is part of Caravaggio's series, and is currently being used in id.wiki, they're two different versions, with the original image is larger and better (credit to LX), no previous deletion request (as i know of).
- Suggester and contact page: id:User:Bennylin
- Suggestion: delete Image:Caravaggio-Crucifixion of Peter.jpg instead :) id:User:Bennylin 14 December 2007 (UTC)
评论 And why not the other way around? I've updated id.wiki with the existing image. It works so I can't see any further problem. --Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 06:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, it didn't because the gallery was built following the numbering: 001, 002, ...,
038, ... which is why i stated the reason above (part of Caravaggio's series). id:User:Bennylin 04:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
支持. Image:Michelangelo Caravaggio 038.jpg had a resolution of 2024 by 2659 pixels, whereas Image:Caravaggio-Crucifixion of Peter.jpg only has a resolution of 618 by 800 pixels. In my opinion, it also has much better colouration, particularly in the shadows. It appears Siebrand acted at the request of Shakko. I'll ask both users to comment. Since the two images are not exact duplicates, I think neither should be deleted, but the currently deleted one may be the preferred one to use. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- 支持 There's no reason we can't have multiple images of the same thing. -Nard 16:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Done I have undeleted the image and asked commons delinker to use the better resolutioned one. The deletion of the otherone will have to go though COM:DEL as it isn't an exact duplicate. -- Cat ちぃ? 22:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
deleted again for the third times by User:ChristianBier and User:White Cat. id:User:Bennylin 76.28.236.199 03:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Back to normal?
[编辑]This file has been replaced/unreplaced etc by another version a number of times, and is now probably back to where it started. There are different reproductions of this painting, use the one that suits your purpose, no need to have all pages using one or the other! --Tony Wills 12:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Colors
[编辑]I saw this paint last week. Horrible colors of actual picture in Commons are not true colors Ursus (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)