File talk:Playing (nude).jpg

 

 

 

Category:Depth of field removed

I removed the Category:Depth of field because this is type of image that many people would like to be alerted to the content before viewing it. Please do not re-add any general categories that would expose people unexpectedly to this sexually explicit/erotic image. FloNight♥♥♥ 23:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Well I want you to explain something : if someone wants to find good examples of depth of field, he would search in the Category:Depth of field. Thus he won't find this picture whereas it is a good example, of great photographic quality. Therefore I tend to take those cat removals as censorship (while Commons is not censored). So what solution do you suggest in order to prevent both problems : not being exposed unexpectedly to nudity (even if I tend to think this problem is overestimated) but having the opportunity to find that good example of depth of field ? (BTW I always wonder why there's no such reasoning with violence while it is a far worse vision than nudity IMO...) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:19, 25 November 2010 (UTC)