File talk:Timeline of Superconductivity from 1900 to 2015.svg

This image should be redrawn as it's very misleading for a non-expert. The scales of both axes are all over the place: 10 K then 50 K per tick (Critical temperature), and 40 years, 15 years then 5 years per tick (Year). At very least, the reader should be alerted about this. Cheers, cmglee (talk) 14:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Just a note about our conversation on my talk page, as an answer to this. PJRay (留言) 12:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Also the blue arrows on the right side are unexplained, and the labels on the horizontal axis are half cropped away. Today Nature announced retraction of the 2020 room temperature (high pressure) result (Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride) so that point should be removed. - 71.115.200.117 20:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Came here to say this. @Cmglee and Gingras.ol: can you update to remove the CSHx point? It was debunked. --SJ+ 15:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh right... #rangadias oh course! 172.254.64.51 04:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@Gingras.ol: I've fixed the crop which you previously had trouble with by changing the document units from inches to pixels. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 23:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Great, thank you! 172.254.64.51 04:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Superconductor critical temperature history

Considering the issues of scale, cropping and retraction, could we consider using File:Superconductor_critical_temperature_history.svg which shows the points to scale with the densely packed area as an inset? Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 09:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)