File talk:Air new zealand 747-400.jpg

I strong disagree with Denniss (see [1]). Why the image cannot be clasified? All images can do... I never observed something similar in all the history of the Wikipedia before. --FML ^hi 00:54, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

This image is not to be categorized back into civil aircraft because its already in a specific article (Boeing 747) in this category. If you recategorize all images linked from articles back into this category then we have hundreds and hundreds of images. Then try to find what you need there. (Should be easier by clicking on the article and you find lots of Boeing 747 images). For me its easier to find images needing a specific article cause I'm trying to maintain this area. --Denniss 02:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

No, no, no... Very strong wrong. Look others examples. The article can live well with the category. Categorize images and articles isn't redundant. The one thing is one thing and other thing is other thing. For you can to be easier find by a specific way, but for all it's easier find by any way. Sorry, but in this case you are roundly wrong. Thank's for you understanding. --FML ^hi 14:04, 26 October 2005 (UTC)