Commons:Administrators

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Translate this page; This page contains changes which are not marked for translation.

Shortcut: COM:A· COM:ADMIN

Other languages:
als 0% • ‎asturianu 0% • ‎български 0% • ‎brezhoneg 0% • ‎català 6% • ‎dansk 0% • ‎Deutsch 85% • ‎English 100% • ‎español 33% • ‎فارسی 0% • ‎suomi 3% • ‎français 3% • ‎magyar 0% • ‎Bahasa Indonesia 100% • ‎italiano 3% • ‎日本語 6% • ‎한국어 0% • ‎Lëtzebuergesch 0% • ‎occitan 3% • ‎svenska 67%
Commons Administrator.svg

This page explains the role of administrators (sometimes called admins or sysops) on Wikimedia Commons. Note that details of the role, and the way in which administrators are appointed, may differ from other sites.

If you want to request administrator help, please post at Administrators' noticeboard.

There are currently 254 administrators on Commons.

An admin wielding the mop, a common symbol of administrators. See also: The good admin.

What is an administrator?

Administrators as of April 2014 [+/−]
Listing by language
Listing by date

Number of Admins: 254

  1. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  2. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  3. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  4. á, fi, en-2, sv-2
  5. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  6. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  7. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1
  8. Aka, de, en-3
  9. Alan, es, eu-3, en-2
  10. ALE!, de, en-3, es-3, fr-1, it-1
  11. Alhen, es, en-2
  12. Alison, en, ga-3, fr-2, gd-1
  13. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  14. Alpertron, es, en-3
  15. Amada44, de, en-3, fr-1
  16. Angr, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  17. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  18. Anthere, fr, en-3
  19. Aude, en, ar-3
  20. Avenue, en, de-1, fr-1, it-1
  21. Avraham, en, he-2 (oversighter, steward)
  22. Axpde, de, en-4, es-1, fr-1, it-1, nl-1
  23. AzaToth, sv, en-4
  24. Badseed, el, en-3, it-1
  25. Barcex, es, en-2, fr-1
  26. Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, ga-1
  27. Bdk, de, en-2
  28. Benoit Rochon fr, en-4
  29. Beria, pt, en-2, es-2
  30. Bidgee, en
  31. Billinghurst, en (steward)
  32. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  33. Blacklake, ru, en-2
  34. Blurpeace, en, es-1
  35. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  36. Cambalachero, es, en-3
  37. Captain-tucker, en
  38. Cecil, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, fi-1 (bureaucrat)
  39. Chris 73, de, en-3, ja-1
  40. ChrisiPK, de, en-3, fr-1
  41. ChristianBier, de, en-3
  42. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  43. Cirt, en, es-2
  44. Common Good, en
  45. CommonsDelinkerHelper (bot)
  46. Cookie, es, en-2
  47. Courcelles, en, es-2, fr-2
  48. Coyau, fr, en-1
  49. DaB., de, en-1
  50. Dantadd, it, pt, en-3, es-3, fr-3, gl-3, ca-2, ro-1, el-1
  51. Darwinius, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  52. Davepape, en
  53. David Levy, en
  54. Dcoetzee, en, fr-2, et-1, af-0
  55. Denniss, de, en-2, fr-1
  56. Dereckson, fr, en-3, de-1, nl-1
  57. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  58. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  59. Dschwen, de, en-3, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  60. Edgar181, en, de-1, fr-1, es-1
  61. Effeietsanders, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1, la-1
  62. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  63. Elitre, it, en-3, fr-2
  64. Ellin Beltz, en
  65. Elya, de, en-3, uk-2, ru-1
  66. EPO, da, en-3, de-1
  67. Esby, fr, en-3, de-1
  68. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  69. EVula, en
  70. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  71. Fanghong, zh, en-2, fr-1
  72. Fastily, en, fr-2, zh-2
  73. Flominator, de, als, en-3
  74. Funfood, de, en-2, bar-1
  75. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  76. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  77. Geni, en
  78. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  79. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  80. Gmaxwell, en (checkuser)
  81. Gnangarra, en
  82. Golbez, en, ja-2
  83. grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  84. Gruznov, ru, en-1, fr-1
  85. guillom, fr, en-3, de-1
  86. Heb, da, en-2
  87. Hedwig in Washington, de, en-4, nds-1
  88. Hekerui, de, en-4
  89. Hesperian, en
  90. High Contrast, de, en-3, fr-1
  91. HJ Mitchell, en
  92. Howcheng, en, ja-2
  93. Hym411, ko, en-3
  94. Hystrix, de, en-1
  95. H-stt, de, en-4, fr-1
  96. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  97. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  98. JDavid, pl, en-2, de-1
  99. J Milburn, en
  100. Jafeluv, fi, en-4, fr-2, de-2, ru-2, sv-1, es-1
  101. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (checkuser)
  102. January, en
  103. Jaqen, it, en-2
  104. Jarekt, pl, en
  105. Jastrow, fr, en-3, de-1, it-1
  106. Jcb, nl, en-3, es-3
  107. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  108. Jdforrester, en
  109. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  110. JGHowes, en, fr-2, de-1
  111. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  112. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  113. John Vandenberg, en
  114. Juliancolton, en (bureaucrat)
  115. Julo, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  116. JurgenNL, nl, en-2, de-1
  117. JuTa, de, en-2, fr-1
  118. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-1 (bureaucrat, steward)
  119. Kaldari, en
  120. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  121. Kanonkas, no, en-4, nn-3, da-2, sv-2, de-1 (bureaucrat)
  122. Killiondude, en, es-3, ru-1
  123. King of Hearts, en, zh-4, es-3
  124. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  125. Krd, de, en-3
  126. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  127. Krzysiu, pl, en-2, szl-2
  128. KTo288, en, zh-4
  129. Kwj2772, ko, en-2
  130. Kyro, fr, de-3, en-2
  131. Leit, de, en-3, fr-1
  132. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  133. Letartean, fr, en-3
  134. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  135. Lobo, es, ca-2, en-2
  136. Logan, en, es-3
  137. Lokal Profil, sv, en-4, pt-2, fr-1
  138. LtPowers, en, es-1
  139. Ludo29, fr, en-2
  140. Lupo, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  141. Lymantria, nl, de-2, en-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  142. Magnus Manske, de, en-2
  143. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 (checkuser)
  144. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1
  145. Marcus Cyron, de, en-1
  146. Mardetanha fa, az, en-3, tr-2, ar-1 (steward)
  147. Martin H., de, en-2 (checkuser)
  148. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  149. Matanya, en, he (steward)
  150. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  151. Matt314, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, zh-1
  152. Mathonius, nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1 (steward)
  153. Mattbuck, en, fr-1, la-1
  154. Maxim, ru, en-3, fr-2
  155. MBisanz, en (steward)
  156. McZusatz, de, en-3, es-1, la-1 swg-1
  157. Mentifisto, en, mt, it-2 (steward)
  158. MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, sv-1, no-1
  159. MichaelMaggs, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  160. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  161. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  162. Miya, ja, en-2
  163. Mmxx, fa, en-3
  164. Mono, en
  165. Moogsi, en, la-2, fr-1, grc-1
  166. Morgankevinj, en, es-1, la-1
  167. Mormegil, cs, en-2, de-1
  168. Morning Sunshine, vi, en-3
  169. M0tty, fr, en-1
  170. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  171. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  172. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3
  173. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  174. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  175. Neozoon, de, en-4, nl-4, fr-2
  176. Nilfanion, en, fr-1
  177. NordNordWest, de, en-3
  178. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  179. O, zh, en-4, zh-wuu-2, zh-hu-3, yue-1 fr-1
  180. odder, pl, en-3, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  181. Okki, fr, en-2
  182. Otourly, fr, en-2, it-1
  183. PierreSelim, fr, en-3, es-1 (oversighter)
  184. Pitke, fi, en-4, sv-2
  185. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  186. Pleclown, fr, en-3
  187. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  188. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  189. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  190. Powerek38, pl, en-4, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  191. PumpkinSky, en, de-2
  192. Putnik, ru, en-2
  193. ~Pyb, fr, en-2
  194. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  195. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  196. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  197. Rama, fr, en-3, de-2, la-2, es-1, it-1, ja-1 (oversighter)
  198. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  199. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  200. Rehman, en, si-1
  201. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  202. Rillke, de, en-2, fr-1
  203. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  204. Rodhullandemu, en, fr-1, de-1, sv-1
  205. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  206. Ronhjones, en, fr-1
  207. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  208. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  209. Rubin16, ru, tt, en-3
  210. Rüdiger Wölk, de, en-2
  211. Russavia, en, ru-3
  212. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  213. Sandstein, als, de, en-4, fr-3, it-1
  214. SarahStierch, en
  215. SatuSuro, en, id-1
  216. Sfu, pl, en-2
  217. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1 (steward)
  218. Siebrand, nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1
  219. Skeezix1000, en, fr-2
  220. Sphilbrick, en
  221. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  222. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  223. Steinsplitter, tir, de-4, it-3, en-1
  224. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  225. Sven Manguard, en
  226. Tabercil, en
  227. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  228. Tarawneh, en, ar, de-1
  229. Techman224, en
  230. TheDJ, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  231. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  232. Tiptoety, en (checkuser, oversighter)
  233. Tom, en, es-1
  234. Trijnstel, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 (checkuser, steward)
  235. tsca, pl, en, da
  236. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  237. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  238. Waldir, pt, en-3
  239. Whym, ja, en-2
  240. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, as-2, bpy-1 (steward)
  241. WJBscribe, en, fr-3, de-1
  242. Wsiegmund, en, fr-1, es-1
  243. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  244. Wuzur, de, en-3
  245. wvk, de, en-4, fa-3, fr-2
  246. Yann, fr, en-3, hi-2, gu-1
  247. Yarl, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  248. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  249. Yuval Y, he, en-3
  250. Zirland, cs, pl-3, en-3, sk-2, eo-2
  251. Zolo, fr, en-4, de-2, zh-2
  252. Zscout370, en, ja-3
  253. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  254. KrinkleBot, Bot account; see Commons:Bots/Requests/KrinkleBot (2).

The system currently recognizes 254 administrators. If that is not the last number in the list above, there is an error in the list.

Technical

Administrators are users with the technical ability on Wikimedia Commons to:

  • delete and undelete images and other uploaded files, and to view and restore deleted versions
  • delete and undelete pages, and to view and restore deleted revisions
  • protect and unprotect pages, and to edit admin-protected pages
  • block and unblock users, individual IP addresses and IP address ranges
  • edit the MediaWiki namespace
  • rename files

These are collectively known as the admin tools.

Community role

Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community who have taken on additional maintenance work and have been entrusted with the admin tools by public consensus/vote. Different admins have different areas of interest and expertise, but typical admin tasks include determining and closing deletion requests, deleting copyright violations, undeleting files where necessary, protecting Commons against vandalism, and working on templates and other protected pages. Of course, some of these tasks can be done by non-admins as well.

Administrators are expected to understand the goals of this project, and be prepared to work constructively with others towards those ends. Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate respect community consensus.

Apart from roles which require use of the admin tools, administrators have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Of course, some admins are influential, but that derives not from their position as such but from the personal trust they have gained from the community.

How do I become an administrator?

First, consider whether becoming an administrator is the best way for you to contribute to the project. Experience shows that outstanding contributors of content often reduce their contributions because of the maintenance overhead after they become admins, and this is what we want least. So please contribute your best skills and understand that there are many ways of getting community credit besides being an admin. Admin status on Commons is not an honour for outstanding content contributors, but just provides an additional set of tools for people who show that they want to clean up.

Consider whether you actually need the admin tools for the work you would like to do. The community does not hand out the tools to those who do not need or who are not likely to make use of them. So, if you need the tools only for a limited period, or in order to clean up your own contributions, please simply ask an existing admin to help you out.

Admins are expected to remain reasonably active here, and if after appointment you cease to use the tools for an extended period you will automatically lose them under our de-admin policy. You should expect as an admin to make yourself available on Commons to a reasonable extent (a userpage that asks people to leave messages for you on some other project is not considered acceptable practice for an admin).

More information about the administrators' community roles can be found at Commons:Guide to adminship.

We do not have any hard and fast rules setting out the minimum period you should have been active on Commons in order to apply for adminship, nor any minimum number of edits. However, the requirement that you be an experienced and trusted member of the Commons community typically means that prior to applying you should have had sufficient breadth and depth of experience here to be able to demonstrate that. If you are an admin or an experienced user on another project, by all means mention that, but bear in mind that off-Commons experience is on its own not normally enough.

Although not mandatory, it is often a good idea to talk to existing admins to get feedback about your experience and approach. You may be able to get another admin to nominate you, although self-nominations are also allowed.

When you request adminship, the community will consider your ability to fill the admin role. Individual Commons contributors may have varying expectations of candidates, and you may wish to review some archived applications to get a sense of what people are looking for. As a practical matter, users often want to see a reasonable level of involvement in admin-type activities such as deletion requests, accurately tagging images as copyright violations, new user patrolling, and so on. Users often want to be satisfied that you are an integral member of the Commons community and will look at the way you interact with others, on user talk pages and elsewhere.

The public discussion and vote

Adminship nominations remain open for at least seven days, for votes and comments, unless withdrawn early as unsuccessful. The period starts when you posted your nomination (if a self-nom) or when you posted your acceptance (if somebody else nominated you). At the end of that period the nomination will be closed by a bureaucrat who will either grant or decline promotion. The nomination may be left open for more than seven days, or a longer period specified, should a bureaucrat consider that desirable.

As a guideline, promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not numerically counted, although such users may still offer their opinions on the candidate. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Among other things, the closing bureaucrat may take into account the strength of any arguments presented and the experience and knowledge of the commenting users. For example, the comments and votes of users who have zero or few contributions on Commons may at the bureaucrat's discretion be discounted.

If the nomination is successful, the closing bureaucrat will grant the applicant admin rights.

The request for adminship

When you are ready, make sure you have a userpage, enable email in your preferences, then apply, or ask your nominator to apply, back on the main Commons:Administrators page.

Suggestions for administrators

Please read Commons:Guide to adminship.

Removal of administrator rights

Under the de-admin policy, administrator rights may be revoked due to inactivity or misuse of sysop tools.

Apply to become an administrator

First, go to Commons:Administrators/Howto and read the information there. Then come back here and make your request in the section below.

  • After clicking on the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} ) to transclude it.
  • If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.
Use the box below, replacing Username with your username:



Voting

Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable if you give reasons both for Symbol support vote.svg Support votes or Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ones as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.

Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers.

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.

Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.

Requests for adminship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Nick

Vote

Nick (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

Scheduled to end: 15:41, (UTC)

Nick is an active Commons editor, and the time has come for him to given the admin toolset. Nick is a former admin but lost the tools due to inactivity. Nick is now a dedicated Commons editor, and a knowledgeable one at that. His onwiki contributions only show part of his dedication -- he is ever active on IRC in #wikimedia-commons where he shares his knowledge of copyright issues, and is always willing to help visitors to the IRC channel with issues they might be having. There is little doubt that Nick and this project would benefit from him having the admin toolset. russavia (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I accept, many thanks for the nomination. Nick (talk) 15:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Votes

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nominator. russavia (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Glaisher (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Strong candidate, per nom. -- Cirt (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JurgenNL (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support generally positive experience, although discussing too long instead of just re-applying here, IMHO -- Rillke(q?) 17:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ankry (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support /St1995 17:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alan (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, no problems--Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, +1 no problems --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rzuwig 19:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose – I believe that Nick is too easily offended and is prone to censoring others: [1], [2]. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I partially agree with Michaeldsuarez regarding the removal of the comment. I would much prefer it if an admin addressed criticism, rather than completely removing the comment. That isn't the sort of accountability that I'd like to see in an admin. That being said, I don't regularly contribute here, so I'm not going to outright vote against. Overall, I think that Nick could make good use of the sysop bit here, but that sort of response to criticism is very concerning for me. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Why not? -FASTILY 00:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I saw this RfA yesterday before going to bed; but decided to refrain from participating as I've no previous experience with Nick in his previous admin term, never see him in any serious discussions in VP or VPC where I usually participated. But now I see my name mentioned here and User_talk:Russavia#Past_RfA_copy so would like to give an explanation.
My first encounter with him was at Commons:BN when he requested to restore the admin bits which was rejected by the 'crats (not by Michael if I remember well). Me and stated our arguments gently and clearly; but Nick pointed the case of Michael and asked to restore his rights again and again as in case of Michael. I saw there many admins like Jcb too discouraged him; but he started attacking Michael there, in the De-adminship policy page, and now on every instance where Michael's name is involved. He is desperately trying to bring Michael to new discussions too.
Coming to the point where Michaeldsuarez mentioned me: I still believe Nick's only interest in that discussion was it opened by MichaelMaggs. In fact his comment "If I take a photo, all I need to do is release it under a suitable licence and that's it, I've set an irrevocable and permanent copyright status for the next 70 years, after which it enters the public domain and that's that." was a personal attack against the great photographers here who spend most of their life in difficult situations to nourish this project. That's why I responded boldly (""If I take a photo, all I need to do is release it under a suitable licence and that's it." - Hmm; I'm thrilled by your knowledge on copyright. I wondered on your reasoning that following US law will "protect everybody who chooses to use Commons to the best of our ability and we're not doing that it we start to be less cautious about deleting potential infringing material." Remember Commons is not only for US people.") which was a bit rude that I agreed later. [3]
Personal attacks, unwilling to accept criticism, and tendency to create and maintain close groups for their own agenda: I've high tolerance against personal attacks and I usually ignore such case if against me. But I try to defend a fellow being from attacks even if it makes more enemies. That is just part of humanity and I've no predefined friends or enemies here. Unwilling to accept criticism is a blocking stone for anybody who wish to progress. Sadly many of has this limitation and my advice to anybody who want to become an admin is to consciously fight against this bad habit. Making close groups will not help any for longtime; people will lose their self respect soon. Who want to become a slave dog of his master. :)
Do I made personal attacks: I had responded boldly in many situations including in humorous ways (fate of our poor contributors in the hands of rude admins); but I don't think they are personal attacks. I don't think this or that are personal attacks. :)
Hope Nick will come out of his grudges against MichaelMaggs or any others, and learn how to act neutrally out of his emotions. Best of luck. Jee 03:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • @Nick: Do you still have a copy of your January 2014 draft RfA statement? If so, can you please share it with us? Although it is nice to know what Russavia thinks about you, it would be nicer to know what you think about yourself. What do you have to say about yourself? What are your qualities and skills? How do you wish to serve the Commons community? How do you describe yourself? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
No, I'm afraid not. I didn't keep a copy. I'm sure if you speak to an administrator they may be able to provide you with a copy of the text. I do wonder however, why you ask this question after already deciding I'm too easily offended to work on Commons as an administrator, and opposing my candidacy. Nick (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
The online world is fact-paced, and votes tend to pile up quickly. It's best to act decisively and early, and I believe that already have enough information to make a statement that I can stand by. I already know what you had to say about yourself in 2007 ([4], [5]). I'm curious about what what you have to say about yourself today, although I doubt my opinion will change. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Requests for bureaucratship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.


Requests for CheckUser

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.


Requests for Oversight rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.


Archives

You can find requests for adminship archives at Commons:Administrators/Archive.

See also