Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Врв Илинден 2015.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Врв Илинден 2015.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2016 at 09:19:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Шпиц - uploaded by Шпиц - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose The sky is unnaturally dark, especially at right. A contrast/exposure issue? lNeverCry 19:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- I would say altitude, since this is at over 2,500 meters. Compare with this summit photo (2,000 meters) and other from that altitude and up. --cart-Talk 20:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- The darker sky with higher elevation is caused by the atmospheric aberration due to the scarcity of air. It may be mitigated by using a polariser but the higher contrast of the blue may not. How much this phenomenon will be pronounced also depends on the distribution of clouds on the sky and the location of the sun. For a similar appearance, see this, this, this and this (there are many other examples).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Support Jee 02:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per INC. Snow should be white, not grey, and right now it is nowhere near the right of the histogram. However, I do tend to agree regarding the color of the sky at high altitudes; take for example my own File:Bodie September 2016 019.jpg (2,500 m), as I've never seen the sky so blue at high noon at lower altitudes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- I tend to disagree with you, not because what you're saying is untrue, but because you miss an important point. Yes, the snow is white so is in this case (except for the cloud shadows, which are normally grey), but its actual whiteness is subject to factors, such as exposure to sunlight and distribution of clouds around the sun. Please note that the left side of the mountain is whiter because of its direct exposure to the sunlight, while the right side is greyish because of its location in shadow. It's also to be noted that the shadow colour depends on how much the sun is covered with clouds and the angle at which the sunlight is emitted. The clearer the sky and the straighter the angle, the blueish the shadow will be; otherwise, the shadow will be greyish. That said, the cloud shadows are always grey, because the sunlight can never reflect from the clouds on the ground at a straight angle; the snow dune shadows may be greyish or blueish depending on the aforementioned factors (compare this one as an example where the direct sunlight reflects at straight angle and the snow dune shadows on the bottom of the image are blueish with this one as an example where the angle is not that straight and the sunlight is hindered). For me personally, one of the main reasons for nominating this one was the quality of textures, lighting and colours.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Support The light and colors are what I expect them to be under these circumstances. (The only thing "missing" is the beacon at the summit. ;) ) --cart-Talk 10:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Support ~★ nmaia [[mia diskuto]] 02:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Mild
Oppose - Nice snowscape, but not quite interesting enough for me to want to feature it, as there are lots of possible snowscapes to feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Support------Isasza (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Per Ikan.--Jebulon (talk) 11:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Not outstanding enough, too large areas which show just white snow without something eyecatching --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Support Lovely image. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural