Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015.07.11.-05-Mulde Eilenburg--Grosses Ochsenauge-Weibchen.jpg

File:2015.07.11.-05-Mulde Eilenburg--Grosses Ochsenauge-Weibchen.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2015 at 15:14:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2015.07.11.-05-Mulde Eilenburg--Grosses Ochsenauge-Weibchen.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015.07.11.-05-Mulde Eilenburg--Grosses Ochsenauge-Weibchen.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_.28Brush-footed_butterflies.29
•  Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Hockei (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good sharpness and light, recommend to crop at bottom and top for a rectangular frame instead of a square. -- Zcebeci (talk) 16:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Fenerli1978 (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Mild support Great detail on the butterfly, but I think it would be stronger with a tighter crop. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment About crop: It's a matter of taste. Just for remaining look at here where the crop was too tight for the most reviewers. I never choose a static format e.g. 4:3 or 1:1 or what ever. For me, when I look at a picture I don't like a feeling that says to me: "cut it! (or vice versa)". And here I don't have this feeling. --Hockei (talk) 10:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:46, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Isasza (talk) 19:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 05:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm spoiling the party, but it's really too washed out, I'm missing a lot of detail, sorry. I also find the only flower in the background disturbing. Nothing against you, Hockei, but I'm surprised of all this support here. --Kadellar (talk) 17:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

@Kadellar: Please see here ;-) --Laitche (talk) 21:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

...but I'm surprised of all this support here... And I'm surprised about your cheap propaganda. --Hockei (talk) 17:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera