Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beach in Helsingør, Denmark.JPG

File:Beach in Helsingør, Denmark.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2016 at 11:29:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Beach in Helsingør, Denmark.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beach in Helsingør, Denmark.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 20:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support A scene that somehow seems to work only in Scandinavia. I'd prefer a deeper field, but that might not have been possible. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow for me, sorry. Compositionally, the curve between the sand and water doesn't really lead anywhere. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

 Oppose - To be honest, I feel the same way. This is a perfectly good QI but lacks the "wow" factor for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose doesn't seem straight to me --Rettinghaus (talk) 11:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support there is something special at the horizon... --Hubertl 23:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is a bit weak and mood is not so attractive for me, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special. --Yann (talk) 20:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose it lacks a little something...Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose no wow for me. --Pine^✉ 06:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Pine. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)