Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bishan Int, Singapore (Unsplash).jpg

File:Bishan Int, Singapore (Unsplash).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2017 at 00:00:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bishan Int, Singapore (Unsplash).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bishan Int, Singapore (Unsplash).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created by chuttersnap - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by me -- Thennicke (talk) 00:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 00:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I'd like to know, what is shown on the picture and what makes its educational value. --A.Savin 10:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

• It's an aerial photograph of Bishan Bus Interchange as far as I can tell. I didn't take the image, I just think it is of excellent photographic merit. Educational value is totally irrelevant at FPC, but obviously it is an excellent example of aerial imagery and useful for the article on the interchange. -- Thennicke (talk) 00:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

• I don't think educational value is totally irrelevant at FPC. Why do you think so? Also, do you think it would be OK to lengthen "int" to "bus interchange" in the file description? I didn't realize what word was meant by the abbreviation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

• Because that's what Wikipedia's FPC is for. Besides, every shot is educational in its own way. And it's not my image; if you want to nominate it for renaming that is your choice; I don't mind if you do. -- Thennicke (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

• No, I want to edit the file description, which I could just do without your say-so, but I thought I'd broach the suggestion, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

• I've edited it. Feel free to make any changes if you were thinking differently to that :-) -- Thennicke (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you. I'd like to pursue the tangent about whether educational value is irrelevant at Commons FPC. Many people have strongly asserted that it's important, but none of them has spoken up in this thread. Perhaps we should discuss this on the talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --fedaro (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I'm not convinced. Yes, it's an aerial photo of a bus parking, and a good one. But it's just not enough for FP. --A.Savin 20:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A. Savin. Doesn't abstract itself well enough. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)