Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Camponotus sp Tanaemyrmex.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Camponotus sp Tanaemyrmex.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2011 at 02:50:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Infoc/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Muhammad (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Shallow DOF, legs are out of focus. ■ MMXX talk 15:28, 16 October 2011 (UTC)- Oppose too many blurred areas --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Why am I supporting: I know the whole subject should be as focused as possible. But this picture is very educative, in my opinion. It also is pleasant to look at, quality is very high, and it has no major flaws besides the blurred areas. I was amazed by the detail in the eyes of the creature, and in general, the important parts of the body are pretty well focused. The picture of a lady in space was just featured, which in my opinion had relatively low quality, lighting, and detail. Sometimes rules can be broken, not to mention that, a picture of an ant, with such quality, with such a zoom, is impossible to take with no blurred areas, no matter what 'f' value you pick. Subject is just too close. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Great Macro shot, very good quality, blurred areas are normal in this case. --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 04:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Fine Macro shot and nice colors.--Vassil (talk) 12:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
