Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carl Sandburg's Rootabaga Stories (1922), Frontispiece.jpg/2

File:Carl Sandburg's Rootabaga Stories (1922), Frontispiece.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2019 at 11:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Carl Sandburg's Rootabaga Stories (1922), Frontispiece.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carl Sandburg's Rootabaga Stories (1922), Frontispiece.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
•  Info created by Maud and Miska Petersham - restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 11:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I came across this in a discussion on the FPC talk page and I think it was treated a bit wrongly in the first nomination.

Having dealt with scanners and printers most of my life, I know just how much a scan can ruin a good original. The most common thing is that it desaturates the original, sometimes rather heavily. This is because the very stong light of the scanner reflects on the paper and drowns out some of the color of the scanned original. I usually never use a scanner for copying art pictures since the scan requires so much post-editing. A camera is mostly better since it saves a lot of work. However, here the scan has been restored by Adam Cuerden, who I have come to know as one of our best restorers. If he has the original to compare with and says that this is a good likeness, I trust him. The image deserves another chance. -- Cart (talk) 11:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support I agree that we should trust Adam that the colours are matched to the original. Cmao20 (talk) 15:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 15:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 19:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support From what I remember from kids books, the colors of illustrations just are contrasty and saturated like that. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Of course. Thanks! Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --BoothSift 23:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support again. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:46, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 22:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 02:31, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media