Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment Because of hiding big part of ceiling behind the chandelier, I took another picture that shows hidden section.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Weak support Outstanding quality as ever but the crops disturb me a bit. I'd rather see the whole circle of the dome rather than have it cut off in various places. Also the crops aren't quite symmetrical which is a bit disturbing. Still, the very high resolution and beautiful details make it FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks dear Cmao20. I didn't crop the picture. The picture merged from 5 frames (50mp) that form a square with(more 100mp). I tried to capture the ceiling symmetrical but the Chandelier wasn't in the center. I could locate the Chandelier in the center and correct the ceiling Symmetry in the Photoshop, but If I had done that, the circle would cut more than this. I need to 17mm TS-E canon to capture monuments like this.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Oppose The crop is poor (exterior circle cropped off), the angle looks randomed (I'd have looked for some symmetry on left/right or top/bottom), there are halos around the grid of the windows at the bottom (which doesn't happen at the top) and both corners at the bottom are pretty blurry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)- Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I'm reluctant to oppose because the resolution is so high, as usual, but I agree with the criticisms of the crops (and I understand they're not technically crops, but we use that term as a convenient short hand for bits of a circle being omitted). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose bad positioning, missed center. --Mile (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I said before Mr Mile, I located in the center of monument but the Chandelier wasn't in the center.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Given the circumstances, the technical limitations are less than they might have been. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
