Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Draft horse pulling logs in Parc naturel Hautes Fagnes, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour 54 to 55, DSCF3703).jpg

File:Draft horse pulling logs in Parc naturel Hautes Fagnes, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour 54 to 55, DSCF3703).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2018 at 17:34:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Draft horse pulling logs in Parc naturel Hautes Fagnes, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour 54 to 55, DSCF3703).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Draft horse pulling logs in Parc naturel Hautes Fagnes, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour 54 to 55, DSCF3703).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
•  Info I came up to this working draft horse crossing the trail while I bicycled downhill in "Parc Naturel Hautes Fagnes", I had just enough time to get my camera out and grab this shot before my battery died and it disappeared back into the forest. by -- Trougnouf (talk) 17:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 17:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't blame you for taking this picture and seeing what might result—I would have too. However, while the result's a QI I don't feel it's enough for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support For me a great shot, maybe because I myself have done such work. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

You've hauled logs from a rope tied around you in deep woods in pouring rain? Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

It hadn't been raining (though the forest is humid), the horse looked like it was steaming probably because it was very hot from doing such work. --Trougnouf (talk) 15:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC) That's why I found it more impressive than any other working horse on the project (ie Category:Working_horses, Category:Quality images of draft horses, Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids))--Trougnouf (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment When evaluating a picture you should be able to distinguish wooden logs from tree trunks and tension chains from a rope, otherwise it would be advisable to visit an ophthalmologist. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Optometrist, I think you mean. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

In Germany, we tend to see ophtalmologists (and medical practitioners in general) rather often, thanks to universal healthcare. Optometrists just make my glasses but I usually see a doctor first. And now calm down everybody --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment The image is rather dark, with the animal not too isolated from its background. The outlines are difficult to distinguish without an effort of concentration -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Done I've increased the brightness and sharpening and improved the denoising. --Trougnouf (talk) 14:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

• It's a very nice photo but sorry to say, it looks a bit washed out now, there are other ways of making a subject stand out. You unfortunately had the light from the wrong direction and that was very visible in the first version. This can be corrected though, plus a bit warmer shadows (just the shadows, not the whole pic) and an emphasize on the steaming horse would be better. A 16:9 crop wouldn't hurt either. Any version is yours if you want them. --Cart (talk) 15:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you! I'm not using your version because it's based on the jpeg but I tried applying your feedback as much as possible. I restored all the exposure stuff to sane values and I used drawn and parametric masks to make the horse stand out, the image is a little bit warmer and cropped to 16:9-ish. I uploaded the raw file in case you or anyone would like to try any further change. --Trougnouf (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Neutral now. A little bit better, but still a dark and not very contrasted composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support This is perfectly fine for me. You got some depth in the photo now and the cut helps a lot. Of course it's always better to work from raw, I think you did a good job. To borrow an expression from Daniel: "You can almost smell the damp horse now. " :) --Cart (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Cart --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Quality could have been better but the atmosphere is great. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Congratulations on making it to FP. --Cart (talk) 20:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)