Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dunmanus Bay from Dun Lough.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Dunmanus Bay from Dun Lough.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2023 at 10:09:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ireland
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by Podstawko ●talk 10:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC).
- Neutral. I'm abstaining from voting as the author. The image depicts the westernmost part of Dunmanus Bay as seen from Dun Lough lakes. It was taken taken from almost the tip of the Three Castle Head, with the camera facing east, soon after sunrise. Dunlough lake on the right-hand side. No-name lake on the left-hand side. Coosfoilycroneen, Coosheenatowick ocean inlets -- parts of Dunmanus Bay -- visible in distance. The unsharp part at the bottom is deliberate to increase the sense of depth. Podstawko ●talk 10:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Really nice to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Breathtaking landscape, but I don't understand why F/5 with a 120mm focal length. I think F/11 would be the minimum (even if it means increasing the ISOs) to bring more details in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you @Basile Morin for commenting and supporting. The wide aperture was a personal and deliberate decision to stress the impression of depth (see description above). I did make attempts with smaller apertures and the end result did not convey what I felt when standing there. Podstawko ●talk 08:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support But maybe a little bit lighter would have been a little nicer.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Impressive! I'm struggling with the blurred foreground. This is not really helpful or necessary for the impression of depth in this motif. --Milseburg (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support A little bit dark but nice place and I don't mind the foreground at all. BigDom (talk) 19:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support The wow factor wins here. ★ 02:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Support Great picture and I don't want to nit-pick, but geocode would be useful --imehling (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for voting and commenting @Imehling. Do you know if I can add the geocoding info without uploading a new version? If I need to upload a new version, I'll wait until the voting is over. And yes, I agree, geocoding info in images makes them way more useful. Podstawko ●talk 11:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Quite simple. Just add them to the Summary field. Copy the template from one of the pictures with geocode. You can pick up the coordinates of your picture from google map (and you can also use decimal format for them) imehling (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done. With many thanks for the advice @Imehling. If you have any tips on how to preserve coordinates all the way from the camera (which sets them for me) through mixed Lightroom and PS pipeline all the way to Wikimedia upload (where they are lost somewhere on the way), I'd love to hear. Podstawko ●talk 21:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- The coordinates are part of the metadata of the picture. You should be able to view them with lightroom and to find out at which point of your processing pipeline you lose them. imehling (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done. With many thanks for the advice @Imehling. If you have any tips on how to preserve coordinates all the way from the camera (which sets them for me) through mixed Lightroom and PS pipeline all the way to Wikimedia upload (where they are lost somewhere on the way), I'd love to hear. Podstawko ●talk 21:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Quite simple. Just add them to the Summary field. Copy the template from one of the pictures with geocode. You can pick up the coordinates of your picture from google map (and you can also use decimal format for them) imehling (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for voting and commenting @Imehling. Do you know if I can add the geocoding info without uploading a new version? If I need to upload a new version, I'll wait until the voting is over. And yes, I agree, geocoding info in images makes them way more useful. Podstawko ●talk 11:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Support Very nice mood, though I don't agree with the decision to use f/5. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ireland