Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Europäische Zentralbank Frankfurt.jpg

File:Europäische Zentralbank Frankfurt.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2022 at 14:05:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Europäische Zentralbank Frankfurt.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Europäische Zentralbank Frankfurt.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
•  Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 14:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Fascinating details.--Ermell (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Very impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support — Although I like the architecture more than the picture. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 13:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Strong support Simply wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support a tad noisy and heavy handed on clarity but very nice and clean (empty street) architecture shot. - Benh (talk) 16:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I dissent. Certainly a good QI (with the caveats mentioned above), but basically very well-done and probably a good promotional image, but no great composition to me. The shapes of clouds would need to cooperate more, especially since all that blacktop is boring to look at. Basically, this photo looks very colorlessly corporate to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Impressive composition to me but it’s overall rather noisy, especially the glass panes and building edges, there’s much "burbling" as if from heavy noise-reduction processing. Might be air turbulence as well. I am aware we’re talking about 36 megapixels here but it just bothers me. --Kreuzschnabel 06:18, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the architecture of the buildings and the composition but agree with the comments about, quality (which is usually superb is Thomas's images) and lighthing are just ok and wow is pretty moderate Poco a poco (talk) 18:18, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan Kekek -- Karelj (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The colorless-corporate aspect to me makes the picture work. This is the headquarters of the most important international central bank in the world, and one of the most important central banks in the world. It should look like this ... this is its truth. Having it in a crowded parking lot with lots of pedestrians under bright sunlight and a sky full of little fluffy clouds would obscure that truth. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment You make your point well, but when the truth is boring, does that make for a great photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support JukoFF (talk) 21:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany