Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2013 at 12:59:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by stuff_and_nonsense - uploaded by Ascaron - nominated by Pava -- Pava (talk) 12:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pava (talk) 12:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Question Barrel distorsion ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- the profile remains linear and faithful to reality, it seems to me that indeed, over a distance that there is both good fidelity of the proportions. Do you agree? --Pava (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Fatto Barrel distorsion corrected --Pava (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The composition (background) is not appealing for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:41, 3 November 2013 (UTC)- Oppose Per Tuxyso Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- While I understand the concerns raised by the opposes, this is sort of a work of art within a work of art. Saffron Blaze (talk) 03:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support--Jebulon (talk) 12:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tuxyso.M49314 (talk) 16:55, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- I want to remember that the subject of the photo is the car, it is true that the context makes her, in this case in fact (although I really like the background) I want to emphasize that those buildings, sober and white, and the blue sky clear, make a great neutral background for the car, do not look away from it and not take away the attention. The reader is not distracted by something else. Great visual impact--Pava (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- You are right that the background is relatively neutral regarding color but not regarding form. The background is also quite strong dominated by very clear lines and rectangular forms. IMHO such a shot can only work if there is an interply of forms in the background with the car. In the case here I see no such interply thus my impression is that the background is distracting. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- I want to remember that the subject of the photo is the car, it is true that the context makes her, in this case in fact (although I really like the background) I want to emphasize that those buildings, sober and white, and the blue sky clear, make a great neutral background for the car, do not look away from it and not take away the attention. The reader is not distracted by something else. Great visual impact--Pava (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Nearly excellent. I think if the background was the right-hand-side (white building with two small windows, corrugated roof, blue sky) it would have been wonderful. But the entrance is very distracting. The building appears to be a public toilet, a feature that could have had comic or contrasting effect, but hasn't been exploited so instead looks unfortunate. Colin (talk) 11:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment the image has just become Valued image (VI) for Ferrari 250 Testa Rossa, you can see here the evaluation --Pava (talk) 12:39, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
