Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Field on slopes of Cosdon Hill - geograph.org.uk - 989852.jpg

File:Field on slopes of Cosdon Hill - geograph.org.uk - 989852.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2011 at 06:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Field on slopes of Cosdon Hill - geograph.org.uk - 989852.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Field on slopes of Cosdon Hill - geograph.org.uk - 989852.jpg

•  Info created by Derek Harper - uploaded by Multichill - nominated by GerardM -- GerardM (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- GerardM (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC) An example of the wonderful collection we have been given by the Geograph community
•  Oppose Beautiful, but very small size (640 × 480 pixels).--Ankara (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is tiny.

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

W.S. 10:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment The automatic use of FPX implies that there is no room for the special occasion. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 11:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Please explain what makes this nice VGA-resolution picture a special occasion. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
    • this picture is one of the best pictures of 1.8 million pictures of the British and Irish country side. Celebrating this collection and its scope and its coverage is very much in order. PS I e-mailed the photographer and asked if he has a high res version. GerardM (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
      • Don't you think such a shot could be re-taken? It's one thing if it's a little under the 2 MP, but this is way under. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 04:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
      • Well, I for one, like the fact that he contacted the photographer. Another solution to fix the small resolution is to stitch together several photos, but, because of their size they would need to be around seven, just to reach the required minimum for FP. But, then again, the database at Geograph, where this picture comes from is huge.--Snaevar (talk) 12:18, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Info Added back FPX. Nominator can't contest it. - Benh (talk) 21:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Where does it say in the rules that an FPX cannot be contested ? GerardM (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
    • It's written on the FPX box itself, Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing.... Please at least read the thing... This nomination is closed now.- Benh (talk) 22:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC).