Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gliwice (Gleiwitz) - water tower 03.JPG

File:Gliwice (Gleiwitz) - water tower 03.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2015 at 12:44:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gliwice (Gleiwitz) - water tower 03.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gliwice (Gleiwitz) - water tower 03.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose For me the composition is very poor: the water tower is standing somewhere near a ugly dump field, there are dozens of ugly ruins everywhere as well. I'm sorry but the picture is absolutely not interesting and is nowhere near the FP standards. I tried finding something positive in it, but failed. Maybe only the lighting is fine in it. Though, it probably would suit for QP if that water tower is notable somehow. -- Pofka (talk) 13:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Strange composition. --Tremonist (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I find the composition good. It is the subject and colors which are a bit dull. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support The composition is interesting. It is a lonely and somehow ugly place and this is what the picture shows. The dull colours underline the repellent nature of the setting. The little child and his mum (?) are contrasting very well and can only be seen by those who look very carefully. The image quality is good, the tower is very sharp and I can't see any other shortcomings. All in all, for me this is certainly one of the finest pictures on Commons. --Code (talk) 17:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per Alvesgaspar Poco² 08:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support per Code. --El Grafo (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I can see what Code means but the subject is saying nothing to me. --Laitche (talk) 17:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support I like the composition,not the mum but the tower in the nothing --LivioAndronico talk 19:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose as others. Yann (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good light and composition, but the subject is just a bit plain. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not doing anything for me. -- Colin (talk) 11:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)