User talk:Alvesgaspar

Archives 1 (2006-7), 2 (2007), 3, 4, 5, 6 (2008), 7, 8, 9, 10 (2009), 11, 12, 13, 14 (2010), 15, 16, 17, 18 (2011), 19, 20, 21, 22 (2012), 23, 24, 25, 27 (2013)

Image file:Butterfly April 2008-2a.jpg

Question: where did you take this photograph? It looks very orange-spotted for subspecies tircis... —Grmanners (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Grmanners, I agree with you. But the English description does not mention the subspecies tircis. The problem seems to be that in French, the common name for the species is ... "Tircis" -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Porto Covo April 2013-6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Surf on rock April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments High quality. --ArildV 19:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Surf on rock April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments High quality. --ArildV 19:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arctotis April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Waves July 2009-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments And shades of blue. QI for me. --Kadellar 22:22, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Buxus July 2011-1.jpg

Nous avons un problème avec cette image que tu as prise à Paris, c'est un rosier et non un buis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Didier, nice to hear from you! Bien sur que tu as raison, je vais présenter une protestation officielle au Jardin des Plantes! Or je suis peut-être trop confiant... Merci! Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Galactites april 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Iridaceae April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Looks OK to me. --Tuxyso 19:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arctotis April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Sympetrum April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Galactites april 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. Perhaps you could edit out the purple petals on the left? --Jastrow 20:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Moscow July 2011-46.jpg

File:Moscow July 2011-46.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clarissy. 14:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Poster of white flowers

Awesome! That's a great poster. Thanks for letting me know! 208.87.217.46 01:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Anthemis april 2013-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 07:42, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:White flowers a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very nice, I guess next step is FP, right? --Poco a poco 20:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC) - Nope, I came here now to remove the nom but you were too fast! A better version coming along! -- Alvesgaspar 21:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Salticidae April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 18:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Glebionis April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Nicely done. --Mattbuck 17:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Colored flowers a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality and useful IMO

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Colombo April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:White flowers b.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White flowers b.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Carpobrotus April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Ok.--Earth100 23:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Colombo April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality & good crop. --Selbymay 21:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Anthemis april 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments OK --Rjcastillo 23:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Trifolium April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments OK --Rjcastillo 23:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Yellow flowers a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yellow flowers a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Colombo April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Mafra May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 03:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Mafra May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Mafra May 2013-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mafra National Palace (facade), Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estádio da Luz (exterior) (Stadium of Benfica), Lisbon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Estadio Benfica April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Maybe a too much satured for me, good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisboa May 2013-4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC) Dust spots in the sky to remove (and a weird halo around the flag). --Selbymay 06:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisboa May 2013-6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisboa May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisboa May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. Perhaps small amount of tilt? Or too strong correction of pincushion distorsion? --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisbon May 2013-17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisbon May 2013-16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 06:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Cantino planisphere (1502).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cantino planisphere (1502).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Sonchus May 2013-4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Spiraea May 2013-4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Sonchus May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Cichorium May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Polistes May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Great shot --Rjcastillo 18:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Trifolium May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisbon May 2013-25.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. Some CA (mayby due to f/5.6?) --Moroder 14:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisboa May 2013-11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisboa April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lisboa May 2013-8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:08, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Scolymus April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Scolymus April 2013-4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Support Very good --Llez 04:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, but I'm not happy with the resolution (just above 2 MP). --Iifar 14:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)