Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hommik metsas.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Hommik metsas.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 13:05:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created and uploaded by Külli Kolina - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 13:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 13:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Nice image depicting the brilliance of nature! Target360YT (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support Surreal atmosphere. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
NeutralVery nice idea and nice pic, which I’d love to support, but … considerable noise all over the image, colours oversaturated IMHO, and some chromatic aberration. --Kreuzschnabel 16:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC) – Changing to Oppose having had a second look at it, in the first place for severe noise (caused by brightening I suppose, which is not necessary, the image could be darker altogether), and the bracken looks oversaturated. Composition would be finer for me if the path was better visible, offering a diagonal line. So, try again, since the idea is really nice. --Kreuzschnabel 05:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)- Oppose - This is certainly a good photo, but it doesn't wow me much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Strong support One of those "pictures I am always trying, usually without success, to take" Very well done. I love that sunburst despite the wider aperture than usual. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 00:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support − Meiræ 16:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. Seems like the whole point of this image was to try to make a sunstar, without any thought for composition -- Thennicke (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)