Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Izvori na Crn Drim, Chun.jpg

File:Izvori na Crn Drim, Chun.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2017 at 13:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Izvori na Crn Drim, Chun.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Izvori na Crn Drim, Chun.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
•  Info created by Taskosmileski - uploaded by Taskosmileski - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Dэя-Бøяg 00:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support It has its merits. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 03:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I agree with the others. I might want more sky, but it's quite good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Wow, no one's complained about the colors being perhaps a little saturated! However, I am OK with them. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry to be a party-pooper. It is a very nice scene, but it is lacking in quality. The light is too harsh and it looks like it has been subjected to too much noise reduction resulting in loss of detail. When I looked at the EXIF to find out what might explain this, since with good light such as this, these problems should not be there. Seeing that it is taken with an iPhone explained a lot. It is very good for a mobile photo, but IMO not enough for FP, sorry. --cart-Talk 12:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely scenery and a very traditional type of boat. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support seb26 (talk) 13:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per cart, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good,good --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The water looks like a Monet painting and there is significant overexposure on the boat. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

• I understand overexposure, but looking like a Monet painting is bad? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

• We're here to capture reality, not blobs of paint. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

• OK, that's a clear aesthetic statement. I don't think that's close to being true of every photograph that's been featured, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

• There are legitimate artistic reasons to distort reality, and then cases where reality is unintentionally distorted via inadequate equipment or technique. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Fair point, of course. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose I have to agree with Cart. PumpkinSky talk 16:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 04:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport