Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Antelope Canyon November 2018 006.jpg

File:Lower Antelope Canyon November 2018 006.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2021 at 00:57:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Antelope Canyon November 2018 006.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lower Antelope Canyon November 2018 006.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Arizona
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Great! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Frank. Always wanted to visit Antelope Canyon... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 09:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Question Have you tried lightening the shadows? I did it and it looks so much better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Much better thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose The upper part is blurred, in the middle there are strange halos, some red or white spots (however, these can be corrected). If you don't open the pic it looks very nice, but it has flaws, sorry. --Commonists 12:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

  Unfortunately that's the limitation of depth of field. I'm already using f/11, and focus stacking and/or a narrower aperture is not possible because tripods are not allowed inside. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Neutral Per Charles. -- -donald- (talk) 12:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
• @Frank Schulenburg, Martin Falbisoner, XRay, Agnes Monkelbaan, Charlesjsharp, Commonists, -donald-, and Michielverbeek: I have brightened the image, please take another look. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

• @King of Hearts: Remove the dots I've put in the notes and that's fine by me, even if a crop of the blurred part would be better, but not necessary, however infinitely better.Thanks. --Commonists 10:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

• @Commonists: Fixed -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

• IMO still FP. Thank you for the improvements. --XRay 💬 03:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
• even better! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Striking view. Ok @4000px large -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 08:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Hanooz 18:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 08:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support RolfHill (talk) 12:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support How yonic ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ivar (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#Arizona