Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Main du juive à Tikjda.jpg

File:Main du juive à Tikjda.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2015 at 19:37:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Main du juive à Tikjda.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Main du juive à Tikjda.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Algeria
•  Info created by Chettouh Nabil - uploaded by Chettouh Nabil - nominated by Vikoula5 -- Vikoula5 (talk) 19:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support one of the winner of WLE 2014. -- Vikoula5 (talk) 19:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry the quality isn't enough for FP to me --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
•  weak support It has huge wow to me, but the selective blur to reduce noise in the sky could be improved. Hope author (@Chettouh Nabil: ) sees us. - Benh (talk) 10:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great idea, but I'd have preferred it without the fireworks. And there are the technical issues noted by Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive shot. Even when the lack of quality hurts. --Code (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support - Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
•  weak support nice wow, although could use greater clarity. --Pine^✉ 18:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose A picture may have as much wow and beauty as you like; still it is no FP for me if its technical quality is far below QI standards, like here, obviously. --A.Savin 22:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin --Pudelek (talk) 09:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral after comparing all pros and cons. It has a "wow", but it has technical problems, too. Great idea, but needs improvements. --Tremonist (talk) 12:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• Moral support Great vow, but quality issues (noise, etc.). Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)