Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 83-85 HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Monasterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 83-85 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2016 at 07:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info St Gregory church of the Tatev monastery during sunset, Syunik Province in southeastern Armenia. The Armenian Apostolic monastery, built in the 9th century, hosted in the 14th and 15th centuries one of the most important Armenian medieval universities, the University of Tatev, which contributed to the advancement of science, religion and philosophy, reproduction of books and development of miniature painting. All by me, Poco2 07:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco2 07:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support - I love the light. This is a beautiful photo. You could sharpen the top of the spire just a tad if you like, but regardless, this is an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Great image! I like the period of the day this image was taken.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Stunning indeed! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 09:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support --cart-Talk 10:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry but at full reslolution I feel as it have a focuse issue. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Christian, I applied some sharpening in the corner that KoH mentioned Poco2 17:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Really sorry but I don't think there is a sharpening issue, it seems to my eyse that there is an issue with the focus or maybe a camera shake, this is not fixable, and honestly at full resolution it is disturbing, and sorry again but I don't understand the support votes here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Christian: Please, have a last look. My last try to catch you :) Poco2 19:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- No really, it's not fixable, if it is a HDR photo, I guess there maybe have been a little camera shake one one of the photos. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Christian: Please, have a last look. My last try to catch you :) Poco2 19:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Really sorry but I don't think there is a sharpening issue, it seems to my eyse that there is an issue with the focus or maybe a camera shake, this is not fixable, and honestly at full resolution it is disturbing, and sorry again but I don't understand the support votes here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice light indeed, but main subject is mostly not sharp. --Ivar (talk) 20:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Will address the spots with frindges tomorrow. About the sharpness overall I just don't agree. I see detail everywhere --Poco2 23:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Ivar: fringing is gone Poco2 17:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- I think your edits have substantially improved this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Ivar: fringing is gone Poco2 17:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Will address the spots with frindges tomorrow. About the sharpness overall I just don't agree. I see detail everywhere --Poco2 23:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support The building itself is perfectly sharp; only the lower left corner has some unsharpness. And when I downsample to 50% (11 MP) even that disappears. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support While fixing the noted fringing would be nice, it is not essential for me to support. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Light is not good for a FP. -- Zcebeci (talk) 06:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - For what it's worth, I disagree, as I find the soft light of the early stages of sunset very relaxing and appealing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 14:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough, and the light come from the wrong direction IMO. Nice place and composition though.--Jebulon (talk) 23:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 23:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings