Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Sëuc Seiser Alm Montes de Gherdëina.jpg

File:Mont de Sëuc Seiser Alm Montes de Gherdëina.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 20:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Sëuc Seiser Alm Montes de Gherdëina.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Sëuc Seiser Alm Montes de Gherdëina.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Italy
•  Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp photo, good composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support though maybe contrast can be boosted slightly. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support. Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Sadly there are many horizontal posterization artefacts in the sky, one noticeable one right above the highest peak. – Lucas 08:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I can see that only if I really pixel-peep at full size. Is that what you're doing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I can see some of them in the preview and other zoom levels as irregular shapes that could be clouds, but really are the artefacts. Again, the ones placed right above the highest peak are the best example. – Lucas 08:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @Lucasbosch: I can't see them even at 200% size. This is a screenshot of a high contrast detail 100% size nad I don't see any wrong lines beside the clouds. Could you please put a note --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @Moroder: I put notes on your high contrast image. The posterization is a sudden change in brightness and has an irregular shape. – Lucas 14:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

• I would call those cirrostratus clouds (Schleierwolken). I don't see any posterisation on my Eizo monitor --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

• It's possible that there was the "edge" of a cloud at the parting line originally, but as I see it something in the capture and/or post-processing (not necessarily your fault) made a harsh split of tones out of it there, with some speckles inbetween. I don't want to belabor this any more, I see artifacts that I'm convinced are not natural, but if I am alone in this it's okay. I hope it's not caused by my monitor ... – Lucas 17:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support--Jpcomic (talk) 08:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

• Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Needs theme music ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

• An Alpine Symphony - Richard Strauss --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Support A bit warm with regard to color temperature for my taste, but still a fantastic shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Brilliant. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Ok, it's an alp, so I'm not a fan. But a very, very good photo of an alp. My own photos of this view and the Dolomites are unfortunately lost. --Cart (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support It's tempting to print it off and put on my wall. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Amazing quality like a beautiful painting, however, posterization on the sky. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, there is some mild posterization going on in the sky (Lucas, your monitor is OK). It is difficult to see because there is still some structure in the posterized areas: It takes place in the clouds, but it is very clearly an artifact of digital processing. I'd prefer to see this fixed, but it is a minor issue. --El Grafo (talk) 09:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:31, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Italy