Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monumento a Johann Strauss, Stadtpark, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 102-104 HDR.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Monumento a Johann Strauss, Stadtpark, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 102-104 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2020 at 18:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
- Info Blue hour shot of the monument to Johann Strauss, inaugurated in 1921 and located in the Stadtpark, Vienna, Austria. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Red channel appears to be slightly blown. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Are you suggesting that I reduce the saturation of the red channel or rather a WB ajustment? Poco a poco (talk) 10:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Just a simple highlight reduction. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done, but according to Lr there was no overexposure Poco a poco (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support, sometimes it's more about the visual effect. For landscapes I like to push the highlights as far as I can without blowing them out, to really make use of the full dynamic range available, but I've found that for structures being too close to 255 reduces the apparent detail even if nothing is actually blown out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:15, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Done, but according to Lr there was no overexposure Poco a poco (talk) 16:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Just a simple highlight reduction. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Are you suggesting that I reduce the saturation of the red channel or rather a WB ajustment? Poco a poco (talk) 10:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light and a very sharp, detailed photo. Cmao20 (talk) 06:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Surroundings are dead and dull, and the most of the photo is of surroundings. Light on the statue is nice. —kallerna (talk) 07:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support I like it, the monument stands out well in these light conditions. The trees are creating quite mysterious atmosphere and work as good balanced elements. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Even if the light is nice, I find the surroundings and the overall atmosphere a bit creepy. --StellarHalo (talk) 01:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- @StellarHalo Isn't it a good thing? Good photo should wake some feelings in us and they don't have to always be bubbly and happy. I'd be proud to make a photo with creepy atmosphere :) --Podzemnik (talk) 07:52, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe, but dark and gloomy feelings are not something I would associate with a monument of a composer. StellarHalo (talk) 07:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support in agreement with Podzemnik and Cmao20 --GRDN711 (talk) 13:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Isiwal (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful music lights up a dark, bleak world. Daniel Case (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Podzemnik. --Aristeas (talk) 08:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors