User talk:GRDN711

Archives 1 - 2018 - 2019 2 - 2020 - 2021 3 - 2022 - 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-04-28 MV KITTITAS - IMO 7808114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kittitas (ship, 1980) - IMO 7808114.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-01-09 ELM K - IMO 9614294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elm K (ship, 2012) - IMO 9614294.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Queen of Cumberland (ship, 1992) - IMO 9009360.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carnival Vista (ship, 2016) - IMO 9692569.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-01-07 BC Ferries QUEEN OF CUMBERLAND - IMO 9009360, at Swartz Bay, BC Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 10:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-11-19 02 MV COHO - IMO 5076949, leaving Port Angeles, WA USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 22:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-07 AQQALUK ITTUK - IMO 8208725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aqqaluk Ittuk (ship, 1983) - IMO 8208725.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and a pretty picture, but I feel impelled to ask: How many ships are there in the world today? If each of them merits its own scope, are we potentially talking about tens of thousands of scopes for ships? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: There are about 55,000 commercial ships in the world. However, Commons is a small depository for ship images and there are even few Valued images of ships - to date approximately 100. If there were 1000 in five years, I would be surprised. A step forward might be to define Domain-specific scope guidelines (COM:VIS) for ships similar to animals and plants. --GRDN711 (talk) 07:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment That sounds like a good idea. I wouldn't know how to start, but I'd welcome it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vega Scorpio (ship, 2010) - IMO 9491599.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on!

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020-01-18 MIMER - IMO 9002647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 08:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimer (ship, 1990) - IMO 9451563.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

e-mails

Sorry, Gordon, for some reason I cannot get emails via Wiki. Please use charlesjsharp@hotmail.com or post on my talk page. Best wishes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelagodroma marina (White-faced storm-petrel).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. Very good image, useful and used, but poor scope. If I would have to judge the scope I would say „Contra“. -- Spurzem (talk) 09:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, we do not need adult in scope. Adult is assumed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Spurzem, Charlesjsharp Accept your comments and have removed "adult" from the scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 22:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

The "adult" didn't bother me at all. The scope doesn't tell me enough what I see or should see. -- Spurzem (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment The scientific name should be written in italics. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Done. Thank you for your review, Palauenc05. I did put the original scientific name in italics but found that you have to apply it to the whole category name to have the italics hold in the display. Always learning something new with HTML :) --GRDN711 (talk) 17:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Kampen, Eiltank 39 D 04804490. 28-02-2022. (actm.) 01.jpg

Good evening GRDN711, Thanks for the comment on my photo. I have tried to get further details of the ship via the internet. By searching, among other things, on the ENI number 04804490 and the EU Number 2324686. I can't get any further with the name of the ship either. What is wisdom? Greetings, --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Agnes Monkelbaan: As this ship is a small inland tanker, mostly sailing in European canals and waterways, it tends to be referenced by MMSI, ENI and EU numbers, even call sign. However, it has a relatively unique name, and if you just do a Google search on "EILTANK 39", image and site references pop up. There are references to its IMO number (generally considered the best as a unique identifier of the hull when built that does not changef over time). While there are IMO references in some commercial sites like Fleetmon and MarineTraffic, a user site that is both comprehensive and quite accurate is Shipspottingdotcom. There are images going back to 2000 when it was named the "Van Gogh". Another Dutch site for ship collections is De Binnenvaartshipen. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for your information. If I understood correctly I should add DC2786 to the category. Is that right?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

  Hello Agnes:

  “DC2786” is the callsign for the radio on the EILTNAK 39. While it is part of the ship information, it can be moved with the radio or re-assigned. The IMO # is the best unique identifier of the ship.

  When a new ship is added to Commons, there are two steps taken.

  1: Create “Category:IMO #######” as a sub-category under parent category “Category:Ships by IMO number”.

  The IMO # is assigned to the hull of the ship when built, never changes. It is a unique descriptor and more universal among ships than MMSI, ENI, EU or Callsign numbers which the ship may also have.

  2: Create “Category:Ship’s Name (ship, build year)” as a sub-category of “Category:IMO #######”

  Ships can have different names at different times in its useful shipping life but only one name at a time. This one has had 4 different names over its shipping life to date.

  Note sure if you are aware of this, but there are 8 other similar ships to this one named "Eiltank" with different numbers (Look up under Commons Category:Ships by Name).

  Once you have done these two steps, typically another User from Wikidata will create corresponding Wikidata items for the ship data (MMSI, ENI, EU or Callsign numbers; GWT, home port etc.) which will show up as info boxes in these two categories. If you want to, you can do this as well but you don’t have to.

  I did not make up with this system. it’s just the way Commons organizes ships. It is quite logical and has been in use for many years. An example is an image of the Icelandic tugboat Leynir.

  I have taken the liberty of creating Category:IMO 9156967 under parent category “Category:Ships by IMO number” and then creating Category:Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000) as a sub-category under Category:IMO 9156967. I have assigned your image of the “EILTANK 39” to Category:Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000).

  Through the VI scope as follows, the claim becomes that this ship is the most valued image in Commons of this ship by name. Through the image, the ship name is connected to the unique IMO 9156967 even if more ships with that name exist.

  |scope=Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000)

  The scope format I prefer is the following because the ships name category is referenced directly to its unique IMO #. The VI claim becomes that this is the most valued image in Commons of this specific ship of this name. So far I have yet to convince many that this is best scope format :).

  |scope=Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000) - IMO 9156967

  Best,

  Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Good evening GRDN711, Sorry for my late response. Internet has been down for us all day. Your explanation is very complicated for me. That's because I don't speak the English language. Would you mind creating the category for me? Or is that a lot of work for you too? Many thanks in advance. Please let me know. Greetings from Friesland in the north of the Netherlands.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

  Hello Agnes:

  Sorry - I did not mean to confuse.

  I have created both categories - Category:IMO 9156967 under parent category “Category:Ships by IMO number” and then Category:Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000) as a sub-category under “Category:IMO 9156967”. Your ship image is now categorized correcctly in Category:Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000).

  All you have to do is modify your VI scope – suggest “Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000)” and link it to Category:Eiltank 39 (ship, 2000).

  Best,

  Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 22:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

• Good evening Gordon, Great that you did that for me. I have since changed the VI scope. Thank you very much for all your effort. Greetings,--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW 3/15 PS (Typ DA 4) BMW 3/15 PS (Typ DA 4) Limousine, 1931 - front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 03:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Teasing or reparation? -- Spurzem (talk) 07:38, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Please assume good motives that are clearly stated in my reason for nominating. I just liked the image and thought it was VI. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-04-08 LADY ROSEBAY - IMO 9412751, Bellingham WA USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 18:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW ZSW 500 - right profile view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Request Please correct the redlink to previous reviews below. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry, Tagooty. This is the first time I have used this renomination format and I thought the bot code created the archive link and saved the previous comments in it. Apparently, it does not (must be done manually) and I cannot re-create nor access it. Basically, previous reviews were mostly comments by me in an MVR on why I felt this image better illustrated the model versus an image nominated by Spurzem. After discussion, I decided to withdraw the MVR and nominate both Spurzem's and this image on their own for general review. --GRDN711 (talk) 06:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Previous reviews

•  Support Best in scope right profile view and used. One VI in DKW ZSW 500 is scope front view. --Tagooty (talk) 09:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lady Rosebay (ship, 2010) - IMO 9412751.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Also beautiful, an obvious QI and even a possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Recurvirostra novaehollandiae (Red-necked avocet) in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Absolute excellent, useful and often used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-26 MV QUEEN OF COQUITLAM - IMO 7411155 at Horseshoe Bay, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MV Queen of Coquitlam (ship, 1976) - IMO 7411155.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The quality ist good, though the shadow. But I see only the front and right side of the ship and not all as it is said in the reason for nominating; I miss a view to the rear. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Thank you for your review, Spurzem. I have uploaded a new version with lightened shadows to show more detail.

My VI scope claim, is that this is the most valuable image of this specific ship by name in Commons without limitation to a view sub-scope. It is slightly to the front but also shows the full ship along the side well. There are only 8 images of this ship in Commons, and while one of them is a profile, I am nominating this one as being a better image. In bird or animal terms, my VI claim is being the best of species, rather than a sub-species. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support. O.K. now; useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MF Tustna (ship, 2019) - IMO 9855393.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
CNS Cabo de Hornos (AGS-61) - IMO 9495351.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loxodonta africana (Running elephants).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Elephants don’t move often and quickly. To capture this moment makes this image by User:Byrdyak valuable in Commons. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
*  Best in Scope, beautiful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-25 02 TÓRSVIK - IMO 7807316 in Tasiilaq, East Greenland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gem Star (ship, 1962) - IMO 8887870.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
TÓRSVIK (ship, 1979) - IMO 7807316.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

@GRDN711: Can you please add the size of this ship? -- Spurzem (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, Spurzem  Not done, as size of ship is not required by COM:VICR for review, nor to support the scope. Per COM:VICR (4, 5, 6), image is fully described on the image page; geocoded and well-categorized. However, given your interest, that information is available through the scope category link to Wikidata item Q97996305 of the ship’s name. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Armada Argentina Douglas DC-3 (5-T-22) “Cabo de Hornos” – left side front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Ewell Harbor on Smith Island, Maryland USA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment As a point of style, I don't think we should use postal abbreviations for U.S. states in scopes, so I'd suggest just ending with "Maryland," but I also think File:2021-06-27 02b Smith Island, MD USA - WikiV banner.jpg is best in scope. Why not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:35, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Info Have added “Maryland” to scope but kept the 3-digit ISO code “USA” at the end as Commons is a world-wide platform and not everyone knows where the state is.

I uploaded 02a as a multi-image panorama, then made a 7:1 ratio crop to form 02b specifically to meet the banner requirements of Wikivoyage. It was subsequently used in the WikiV topic of “Smith Island”. While both 02a and 02b meet the scope requirements, my thinking is that 02b is a derivative and use case for the nominated 02a panorama from which it came. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

My reasoning on which image is more useful for use in online articles is that the only difference between the original and the Wikivoyage banner is more water and sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Info I appreciate your perspective for image utilization but let me offer you a another one. The 7:1 crop ratio of 02b looks good in Wikivoyage but being so long and narrow, it is rather extreme and atypical.

Given that someone was looking for a panorama image of Ewell Harbor, 02b is available and linked to 02a, but I doubt that they would opt for something cropped that tight. I am not stuck on this, but my original thinking in nominating 02a, was that the extra water and sky would allow more flexibility in cropping to a shorter 5:1 or 6:1 ratio to fit the space they have, encouraging more utilization on different online platforms. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support OK. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-02 01 JEAN TURECAMO - IMO 7501077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-02 02 JEAN TURECAMO - IMO 7501077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean Turecamo (tugboat, 1975) - IMO 7501077.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-26 02 BC Ferries MV QUEEN OF SURREY - IMO 7902221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:16, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-26 01 Gibsons Marina, BC Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tailed Jay (Graphium agamemnon)വിറവാലന്‍ ശലഭം. (26971718077).jpg

Hi, Do not create DRs without a good reason. Having a watermark is not one of them. Please read COM:DR. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gibsons Marina, British Columbia, Canada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Are you sure "Gibsons Marina" isn't a better scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment In the nomination process I waffled on scopes between "Gibsons" (the whole town of which the marina is one of the best parts) and "Gibsons Marina" (which the focus of the image but is more limited). I can see your point. and have changed the scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MV “Queen of Surrey (ship, 1981)” - IMO 7902221 – port side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment "Port side" would be the appropriate expression in the scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Info Palauenc05 Archaeodontosaurus In this nomination, I had some self-debate on using “port side” versus “left side” in the scope. I wasn’t sure everyone would be comfortable with the nautical bow-stern-port-starboard terms. My compromise was to put the more universally understood “left side” in the scope but include “port side” in the reason for nominating.

In VI nominations for other vehicle transport, the sub-scopes are usually defined in terms of front-back-right-left relative to the front of the vehicle, rather than driver side; passenger side.

Still, I accept your point and have tried to split the difference one more time at “port (left) side”. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry, but the new scope is redundant as "port" is always the left side of a ship. Hence, the scope is too wordy. Superfluous words should be avoided. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Agree with you, User:Palauenc05, on superfluous words. Currently there is not, but if there were COM:VIS domain-specific guidelines for ships, I assume you would favor the nautical terminology of bow-stern-port-starboard views.

In other transport like cars, trucks, tractors, motorcycles, I see view sub-scopes of “front-left” and “back-left” (along with “front”, “back”, “front-left”, “back-left”, “left profile”, right profile”) for full vehicle images, and this does not count the sub-scopes for key vehicle parts.

Would you be in favor of “front-port” as best describing the view of this ship image, or do you favor just 4 view sub-scopes for marine images? --GRDN711 (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Info Palauenc05, Archaeodontosaurus Change in sub-scope to "port side". --GRDN711 (talk) 18:32, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-26 01 BC Ferries MV QUEEN OF SURREY - IMO 7902221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some dust spots in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 20:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC) Done. Thank you for noticing the water spots. --GRDN711 18:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC) Not bad but there are still some left. --Ermell 20:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Done again, Ermell. It was raining that morning; lots of mist; some smoke from the ferry but anything with the round edge of what could be a water spot on my lens cover filter. Have uploaded another version. --GRDN711 15:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-04-26 03 WHATCOM CHIEF - MMSI 368011730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Whatcom Chief (ship, 1962) - MMSI 368011730.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope useful and well composed --Virtual-Pano (talk) 09:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Primrose Ace (ship, 2007) - IMO 9355185 – starboard side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spirit of Vancouver Island (ship, 1994) - IMO 9030682.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-28 MV SPIRIT OF VANCOUVER ISLAND – IMO 9030682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 18:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Corrected - thanks for the review. --GRDN711 22:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Fishing boat Schtroumpf in Port d Erquy

Hi GRDN711: Thank you very much for your details about my Schtroumpf (ship, 1969), in Port d Erquy. I went back to the file history of both images and reverted them to the previous version, although the image quality is not very good.

I used the Lumix DMC-TZ60, which was mainly used for geolocation, but my camera had manufacturing defects (like other user friends). Since then I have been using a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V camera. For post-processing editing, I'm working using GIMP, or Rawtherapie 5.8, I'll be adjusting to 4-bit color depth instead of 8-bit.

Better, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Fishing boat Schtroumpf in Port d Erquy

Hello Pierre André:

Just to be clear, I do not know what is going on in this image, but something is amiss in either the resolution or post-processing.

What I see in this image, even at the VI low-res view, are big, blocky pixels that can be associated with very low-resolution image or some odd post-processing like JPEG compression or a lack of color depth.

Most images will have a color depth of 8 bits or higher. If somehow you were exporting your image with a atypical low color depth of 4 bits, this could cause the big, blocky artifacts visible in this image.

Definitely a good idea to use your new camera - it is the better one.

Best,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Independence Monument (Colorado) at Monument Canyon within Colorado National Monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. (Special photo for me.)--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chionis albus (Snowy sheathbill), adult.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarfaq Ittuk (ship, 1992) – IMO 8913899.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope. The photo (by using a tripod?) could perhaps have been a bit sharper.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

• Shouldn't need a tripod here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pictor J Island (ship, 1994) - IMO 9371426.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:31, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reykjavík Norðurgarði (North Mole) Lighthouse (L4506).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2019-08-13 02 LEYNIR - IMO 9126388.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019-08-13 02 LEYNIR - IMO 9126388.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-06-27 02a Ewell harbor view of Smith Island, MD USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-06-27 03 Chesapeake Bay deadrise workboat used for crabbing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 21:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Watermen unloading catch on Tangier Island, Virginia USA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chesapeake Bay deadrise workboat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City of Vancouver Fireboat 1 (FB-1) – starboard side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Platalea ajaja (Roseate spoonbill) in flight – adult, underside view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Colours look unreal. Can you have a look at saturation or whatever. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for the review, Charles.
  

Uploaded a new version where all post-processing was re-set to the original imported into Lightroom. Applied a lens correction (standard for all my images and has little effect on color). Cropped tighter to the bird and applied a light overall sharpening. The result is a little less saturated than the previous version but not much.

The Sian Ka'an Biosphere, just off the Gulf, is a good source of shrimp that is a significant portion of this spoonbill's diet and the source of carotenoid colorant that creates the pink color. Also, the angle of the sun behind the bird may be contributing to the pink perception with the wings partially in the shade. The area behind the bird’s head is a clean white. There are a limited number of colors in this image but the histogram is normal and the gamma straight at 45 degrees. I did have a skylight UV filter on the lens but not a polarizer. I am reasonably sure this is, or is close to, the actual coloration of this roseate spoonbill. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support OK, it's the UV filter that has led to the sky colour. I would recommend it for wildlife. The bird itself is OK. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MV Tustumena - IMO 6421086, port side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
CCGS Teleost - IMO 8714346, port side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-06-27 02 Chesapeake Bay deadrise workboat used for crabbing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-07-27 01 Winter Harbor, Maine USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winter Harbor, Maine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• File:Winter Harbor.jpg, although slanted, seems better in scope to me. Why not? (By the way, you don't mean disbursed=spent.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you, Ikan, for the wording note (corrected). I must have been thinking about the money I do not have when I really meant “dispersed” as in distributed or spread over a wide area.
  

Winter Harbor is indeed spread out. The image you reference does not show much of the town but primarily shows the ferry dock in Henry Cove to the east. This is where you catch the local ferry to Bar Harbor, or sight seeing boats to Petit Manan. There is also a separate commercial harbor for fishing boats and the fishing cooperative. A small main street of two blocks of stores and restaurants is partially shown on the left. IMO, this nomination best shows most of Winter Harbor as a collection of homes, cottages, B&Bs, the post office, boat launch facilities and three restaurants. It was taken from the ferry dock without benefit of a drone. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support OK, I defer to you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Greenlandic fishing trawler, GR 2-122 Bingo III.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rosebud, Alberta grain elevator.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-23 04 CCGS CAPE EDENSAW 827458 (L) and CCGS CAPE SPRY 825552 (R).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlantic Airways (Faroe Islands) Airbus A319 aircraft (OY-RCG).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bunker Island Lighthouse, Nova Scotia Canada – north view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-07-27 MV FUNDY ROSE - IMO 9203916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a particle on the right next to the smoke, otherwise the image is good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 20:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Am not sure what caused it but it has been fixed. Thank you for the review. --GRDN711 21:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Thank you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MV Fundy Rose (ship, 2000) - IMO 9203916.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-07-26 01 Bunker Island Lighthouse near Yarmouth, NS Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective distortion (tilt to the right) and chromatic noise in the sky, fixable? --F. Riedelio 09:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Fixed the tilt. The mottling which was only noticeable at 300%+ magnification was not chromatic but luminous in nature. I was able to minimize it on both images by increased luminosity noise reduction --GRDN711 18:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Thank you for reviewing. --GRDN711 18:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 18:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-08-21 01 HORIZON ARCTIC - IMO 9732838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-08-21 02 HORIZON ARCTIC - IMO 9732838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-04 01 ACADIAN - IMO 9298715 tanker – St. John’s NL Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-04 02 ACADIAN - IMO 9298715 tanker – St. John’s NL Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horizon Arctic (ship, 2016) - IMO 9732838.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acadian (ship, 2005) - IMO 9298715.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-10 MV SAAREMAA I - IMO 9474072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-10 01 MV CONFEDERATION - IMO 9050008 at Caribou, NS Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 19:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MV Confederation (ship, 1993) - IMO 9050008.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wood Islands Harbour, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-21 03 MV HOLIDAY ISLAND - IMO 7041431, leaving Wood Islands terminal, PEI CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very nice. --Tournasol7 04:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-21 02 MV HOLIDAY ISLAND - IMO 7041431, leaving Wood Islands terminal, PEI CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-10 Ferry Terminal at Caribou, NS Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality panorama. --Radomianin 20:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC) Regarding the camera used the image height seems to be quite low. --Milseburg 19:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-21 04 MV HOLIDAY ISLAND - IMO 7041431, leaving Wood Islands terminal, PEI CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 12:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MV Holdiay Island (ship, 1971) - IMO 7041431.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-10 05 MV HOLIDAY ISLAND - IMO 7041431, at Wood Islands termina after engine fire, PEI CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caribou Ferry Terminal, Nova Scotia, Canada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-08-14 01 HMCS WILLIAM HALL (AOPV 433) - IMO 4702539 - under construction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-21 04 MV CONFEDERATION - IMO 9050008 entering The Cut at Wood Islands, PEI Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-11 03 MV CONFEDERATION - IMO 9050008 leaving Wood Islands, PEI Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HMCS William Hall (AOPV 433) - IMO 4702539, under construction.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-19 01 CAUQUENES - IMO 9687552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-19 02 CAUQUENES - IMO 9687552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09a Harbor view of Narsaq, Greenland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good composition and colours. A bit soft, but good enough. --Tagooty 03:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-10-04a Wide view of the city of Manta, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 07:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manta, Ecuador - harbor view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Narsaq, Greenland – harbor view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, GRDN711! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, GRDN711! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. Pierre André ^(talk) 11:26, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us!

Hello GRDN711,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

• 1st prize: 500 USD
• 2nd prize: 400 USD
• 3rd prize: 300 USD
• Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
• Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
• Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
• Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
• Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group

Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-10-04 03 Tugboat, TIGRE - IMO 9121479, in Manta, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC) Note: Horizon needs correction.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC) Sliight tilt correction  Done Thanks for the review. GRDN711 03:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tigre (tugboat, 1995) - IMO 9121479.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-08-15 01 Wide angle view of Halifax skyline, Nova Scotia, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-10-04 01 Tugboat, TIGRE - IMO 9121479, in Manta, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems leaning out. --Tournasol7 05:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)  Done Made sliight tilt and perspective correction --GRDN711 03:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Tournasol7 05:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-04-19 008 Modern fish tug, AMANDA MAY on Lake Erie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-04-19 019 Side view of modern fish tug, AMANDA MAY at dock in Port Burwell, Ontario Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2008-05-23 The Temple Bar, Dublin, Ireland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-14 01 MS FREYA - IMO 7912020 - Svalbard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-14 02 MS FREYA - IMO 7912020 - Svalbard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-14 03 MS FREYA - IMO 7912020 - Svalbard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

File:2019-08-15 01 SAERUN (SÆRÚN; Særún) - IMO 7713034 01.jpg

Sorry, I missed the deadline for supporting your VI submission. I have takne the liberty of reformatting your description - it is my view that if I cannot find information about the subject in Wikipeia, then the description needs to be reasonably detailed. If you are happy with the changes that I made to your description, resubmit it and I will support it. (Please ping me). Martinvl (talk) 17:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, Martinvl, for your description suggestons. They are definitely an improvement.

I have reviewed and re-nominated the image for VI.

Best,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 10:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freya (ship, 1981) - IMO 7912020.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Særún (ship, 1978) - IMO 7713034 - front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews ... The latest review follows here

•  Comment It's a scope issue. The two images of the boat are complementary and both can be promoted with more precise and different scopes. just add as for car: front view or side view etc... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I was not planning on nominating the other image with the side view as I felt this image was the best overall image of the ship. Still, you make a good comment. I have adjusted the scope and stayed away from nautical terms like "bow view" :) --GRDN711 (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-20 BERGEN VIKING - IMO 9285213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flora (ship, 1960) - ENI 03340157- front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 04:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-18 MF SMØLA - IMO 9855161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-18 01 Høgsteinen Lighthouse (Høgsteinen fyrstasjon, view from north), Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smøla (ship, 2020) - IMO 9855161 – left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bergen Viking (ship, 2007) - IMO 9285213- left side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-26 BULK DESTINY - IMO 9781994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Category for the location should be added. --Ermell 20:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)  Done A Coruña category added. Image also has GPS coordinates. --GRDN711 10:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 18:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-18 02 Høgsteinen Lighthouse (Høgsteinen fyrstasjon, view from south), Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indecisive crop. Peak of mountain in background is missing. If the lighthouse is the main subject, the cut is too wide. --Milseburg 17:35, 28 May 2023 (UTC) Cropped tighter to give lighthouse more impact but still retain the connection to the Norwegian countryside. --GRDN711 19:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC) Okay, you rescued it, but it would have been better to use the camera's full resolution. --Milseburg 11:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)  Comment Thank you for your review. Shooting from across the fjord with the longest focal length lens I have (400 mm), my Nikon 6II provides a full frame image at 6048 x 4024 (28.8 MB). When I export the image from Lightroom for uploading, I always export at whatever resolution the actual image is, be it full or cropped (short side does not exceed 4024 pixels – no upscaling or downscaling). My original (cropped) upload was 5,579 × 3,712 (12.22 MB). After further cropping per your review, the resolution was 4,447 × 2,959 (8.21 MB). ~~~~

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulk Destiny (ship, 2017) - IMO 9781994 - right side (starboard) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-11-23 KL SALTFJORD - IMO 9470478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better, but OK. Category for the harbour added. --XRay 15:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-04 BARDSUND (BÅRDSUN) - IMO 8517542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bardsund (Bårdsund) (ship, 1960) - IMO 8517542 – back (stern) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-18 01 NCL IKORNNES – IMO 9347798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 19:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Provincia de el Oro No I (dredger, 2012).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
KL Saltfjord (ship, 2011) - IMO 9470478 - left (port side) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-01 01 UK Pilot Boat DOVORIAN - MMSI 235037385 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-01 01 UK Pilot Boat DOVORIAN - MMSI 235037385 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-22 01 UK Pilot Boat DOVORIAN - MMSI 235037385 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-01 01 UK Pilot Boat DOVORIAN - MMSI 235037385 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dune (ship, 1963) - ENI 06003820 - back (stern) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-10 DUNE - ENI 06003820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Not sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 15:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC) The light of this image is most appealing to me. Added a little sharpening and IMHO it looks better. Please review again. --GRDN711 13:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)  Support ok now. Thanks. --Ermell 08:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Tribonyx mortierii (Tasmanian native-hen)

Hello Gordon: The procedure for a reset in the contest exists but in this case it is not correct: the bot does not take it into account... Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

• • Unexplained error. I don't understand how these two nominations reappeared...I removed them. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-07 01 Aquaculture workboat, NOVA - MMSI 25711260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-07 02 Aquaculture workboat, NOVA - MMSI 25711260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dovorian (ship, 2006) - MMSI 235037385 – right (starboard) side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Would a better scope be Aqua Star Nelson 42' Pilot? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment IMHO, as a scope, “Aqua Star Nelson 42' Pilot” would be too wide and not represent the image. The “Nelson 42’ Pilot” model built by Aqua Star Guernsey UK refers only to the molded glass reinforced plastic (GRP) hull that was turned over to the builder, Goodchild Marine Services of Burgh Castle, for completion. Based on direction from the Dover UK Harbor Board, they added all the extra components from engines to communications to livery; in completing this purpose-built pilot and harbor boat. My current scope supports the VI nomination that this image is the most valuable of the starboard view of this specific workboat in Commons. --GRDN711 (talk) 22:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment The scope is okay, though consider "starboard rear ..." as more accurate. Is there a small CCW tilt? The image is used, I'll support it after responses. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Hard to know if this boat is tilted in a rough sea as it is running over a swell. Still, did a small tilt adjustment to make the antennae more vertical and I think this helps.

On the issue of scope, this view is primarily of the right (starboard) side. By being slightly towards the back, it presents the best three-dimensional view of the ship from the starboard side and shows the ship in full detail.

I am reluctant to get into more sub-scope variants than the four sides - port-starboard-bow-stern, as I think it makes ship sub-scopes unnecessarily complicated. I would be willing to drop the view sub-scope entirely and make this a VI nomination as the most valuable of this ship-by-name with “scope=Dovorian (ship, 2006) - MMSI 235037385”. Please let me know your thoughts on this. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Your point about too much sub-scoping is valid. --Tagooty (talk) 11:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

MVR

I have just notice you have two oppose votes on Black-cowled oriole MVR. Easily done :) Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Charles:

Sorry for the slow response - have been traveling and not always connected to the internet.

I thought the first oppose was for the original VI nomination and the second oppose was for separate MVR. It appears the MVR was still hanging around since April and I responded twice. Will delete the second one.

You already have a VI fror "Icterus prosthemelas prosthemelas (Black-cowled oriole) showing chest feathers.

Two points - still disagree with you that different view of feathers are an acceptable sub-scope for the species/sub-species. Feather color and placement is a function of the definition of the species no matter what angle the bird is viewed from and does not represent a valid sub-scope. It would not be a Black-cowled oriole if the feathers weren't colored in a defined manner, front and back. I know you disagree with me on this but I believe it is a valid approach with birds - sub-scopes must represent unique habits, not feather color already defined by the defintinion of the species/sub-species.

The second is that I am very ready for an overhaul of the VI and MVR voting procedure and software. Do you think there is any chance of this happening? VI is not that much different in voting from QI - could we not adapt their software for VI?

Best,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 21:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nova (workboat, 2011) - MMSI 25711260.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gullaas (ship, 1987) - IMO 8700993 - starboard (right) side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-09 02 CSL ST-LAURENT - IMO 9665281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
CSL St-Laurent (ship, 2014) - IMO 9665281- front (bow) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment not an ideal pov - the bow. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Unfortunately, in the Welland Canal, it is difficult to find a good location where you can get a relatively unobstructed view of the ship, except with a drone (don't have that). The ship further adds to the complexity, being a 700-foot long ore carrier. This is the best I have. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Support The scope is correct, and the image is used. No problem --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-06 02 GULLAAS - IMO 8700993 in Bergen, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-20 01 LNG tanker, GULF ENERGY - IMO 7390143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-20 02 LNG tanker, GULF ENERGY - IMO 7390143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Todiramphus sacer (Pacific kingfisher) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thalassarche eremita (Chatham albatross) – in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Misana (ship, 2007) – IMO 9348936 - starboard (right) side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-20 01 RORO Cargo MISANA - IMO 9348936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Below minimum size requirement. --Milseburg 13:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC) Sorry - originally uploaded lower res extracted video still by accident. Have now uploaded correct still image with higher resolution. --GRDN711 20:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC) I marked some spots. --Milseburg 08:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC) Spots addressed. --GRDN711 12:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Good quality now. --Milseburg 12:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-20 03 RORO Cargo MISANA - IMO 9348936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Insufficient quality. Below minimum size requirement. --Milseburg 13:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC) Sorry – my mistake. Have fixed by uploading correct still image with higher resolution to replace original extracted video still. --GRDN711 20:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC) Better now. But in all tree images nominated on 28 June there are (still) spots in the sky. --Milseburg 19:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Great job on the full resolution version. --ReneeWrites 00:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC) I marked some spots. --Milseburg 07:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC) Spots addressed. --GRDN711 12:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Good quality now. --Milseburg 12:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gulf Energy (ship, 1978) - IMO 7390143 – starboard (right) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-19 Canadian CCGS ATLANTIC RAVEN - IMO 9187942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eems Delfia (ship, 1985) - IMO 8411633 - front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-10-06 01 Port tender and pilot boat, AMELIA III - MMSI 735059982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-10-06 02 Port tender and pilot boat, AMELIA III - MMSI 735059982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amalie (ship, 1997) – IMO 9163702 – left (port) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Beste Gordon,

Dear Gordon, I received an email from you about Category:ENI: 02208736. Thank you very much, but I don't know exactly what it's about. Because I do not master the English language.
Greetings,--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Agnes:

When you created "Category:ENI: 02208736" for your De Alde Feanen ship images, there was an extra hyphen (:) after ENI. The result of the extra hypen was that this category did not list correctly as a sub-category under the parent Category:Vessels by ENI number.

Rather than try to explain all that (Commons is far too complicated, as is life...), I went ahead and created "Category:ENI 02208736" (no hyphen after ENI); made sure it linked correctly under the parent Category:Vessels by ENI number (does) and moved your ship images into it.

I then left a message at "Category:ENI: 02208736" seeking to have an admin get rid of this extra redundant category, not relaizing that it would go to you.

At any rate - all in fine now with yout ENI category for your De Alde Feanen ship.

Best,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 17:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Good evening Gordon,
hank you very much for the great work you have done for me. I am very happy with that
Kind regards from Agnes,--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-20 AMALIE - IMO 9163702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-02-25 SZARE SZEREGI - IMO 9708057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szare Szeregi (ship, 2015) - IMO 7041431- left (port) side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-08-19 MV LEIF ERIKSEN - IMO 8917388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 23:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leif Ericson (ship, 1991) - IMO 8917388 - right (starboard) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-07 01 MAERSK DISPATCHER - IMO 9298909 in St. John's NL CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-07 03 MAERSK DISPATCHER - IMO 9298909 in St. John's NL CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-07 04 MAERSK DISPATCHER - IMO 9298909 in St. John's NL CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-09-30 02 Franklin Camp grave images, Nunavut Canada 2015-09-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maersk Dispatcher (ship, 2005) – IMO 9298909.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 08:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-14 MS VIRGO - IMO 7504213 - Svalbard, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Virgo (ship, 1976) - IMO 7504213 – view of left (port) side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 02:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-08-29 Indian Head Lighthouse in Bedeque Bay, PEI Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-06-18 NINA MACKAY III - MMSI 232043472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Indian Head Lighthouse, Summerside, PEI Canada – view from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope and useful --Terragio67 (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-02 01 Wide harbor view of Fortune, Newfoundland Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 19:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town of Fortune, Newfoundland Canada – harbor view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sympetrum sanguineum (Ruddy darter), male – frontal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  OpposeI don't nominate front-on insect pictures for VI. They have less EV. I think side-on and dorsal are quite enough. There are no VIs because it is impossible for anyone to go through every image when there are 400+ to choose from. With so many FPs, who needs a VI? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support As that is the VI scope guideline interpretation by Archaeodontosaurus. It seems inconsistent with the discussion we had some time back when my 'showing front feathers' and 'showing back feathers' nominations were challenged with the argument that we should generally only have one scope per species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:20, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

• •  Comment Charles - your decision not to nominate front-on insect images is your personal choice. As a view, as long as the image shows the species well, head-on is no different than the underside, ventral or dorsal views you tend to favor.
    
  • I nominated this image by User:Ermell for VI as being exceptionally well done using a novel focus-stacking technique that allows for sharp detail and depth of field in the head, gossamer wings, legs, thorax and abdomen. All of this, where the insect that may be moving slightly, or being blown gently in the wind.
    
  • Yes, I did note that this dragonfly was photogenic but images at this frontal viewpoint are less than ten and easy to distinguish.
    
  • Each of the ratings systems, QI FP VI, has their own unique purpose and criteria. Success in one rating does not preclude further image success in another. If an image meets the criteria by consensus of the reviewers, there is no reason that it cannot have all three QI VI FP ratings, as do several of your own images. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Very good and useful shoot --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

• Archaeodontosaurus, please note that this image was ignored in 2021. This stopped me nominating head-on dragonfly images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
• @Charlesjsharp: I see this as an excellent opportunity to present it again in the competition...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-09-04 01 NORWEGIAN SKY - IMO 9128532 - Charlottetown PEI CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-09-04 02 NORWEGIAN SKY - IMO 9128532 - Charlottetown PEI CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Acceptable, good enough. Category for location added.) --XRay 03:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-03-04 01 NORWEGIAN ESCAPE - IMO 9677076 - Port Canaveral FL USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-03-04 02 NORWEGIAN ESCAPE - IMO 9677076 - Port Canaveral FL USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 15:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-02-25 01 SpaceX MEGAN - IMO 9591648 – Port Canaveral FL USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Norwegian Sky cruise ship – IMO 9128532.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Done Thank you, Archaeodontosaurus, for bringing this to my attention - was moving too quick with cut-and-paste :( --GRDN711 (talk) 15:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-02-25 03 SpaceX MEGAN - IMO 9591648 – Port Canaveral FL USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamutik W - IMO 9481805 – starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SpaceX Dragon recovery vessel, Megan - IMO 9591648 – starboard view in the West Basin of Port Canaveral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town of Sooke, British Columbia, Canada – harbor view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-02 WILSON FLEX IV - IMO 9911460 on North Sea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-21 01a Ferry terminal at Wood Islands PEI Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-20 01 Wide view of Sooke BC Canada – 2021-11-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-02-25 02 SpaceX MEGAN - IMO 9591648 – Port Canaveral FL USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would support this is you fix the perspective (verticals). --Plozessor 05:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC) * Done Originally did a wide angle 27mm lens correction but I see what you mean and have added a further vertical correction. --GRDN711 12:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MS Eurodam - IMO 9378448 - port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-09-04 01 KAMUTIK W - IMO 9481805 - Makkovik, Labrador CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs noise reduction. --Ermell 12:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)  Done --GRDN711 02:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC) Thank you but there are some dust spots to be removed left. --Ermell 22:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Sorry for the slow response – have been away and off-line. Thank you, @Ermell: for the careful look. Think the sky is now clean. If you see anything further, please note box it and I will address. --GRDN711 02:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC) The left side is still not ok --Ermell 21:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thank you, @Ermell: Blue skies are a challenge for dust spots. Please take another look. --GRDN711 01:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. The more you close the aperture, the more visible the dust spots become --Ermell 09:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-09-04 01 KAMUTIK W - IMO 9481805 - Makkovik, Labrador CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs noise reduction. --Ermell 12:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)  Done --GRDN711 02:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC) Thank you but there are some dust spots to be removed left. --Ermell 22:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Sorry for the slow response – have been away and off-line. Thank you, @Ermell: for the careful look. Think the sky is now clean. If you see anything further, please note box it and I will address. --GRDN711 02:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC) The left side is still not ok --Ermell 21:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thank you, @Ermell: Blue skies are a challenge for dust spots. Please take another look. --GRDN711 01:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. The more you close the aperture, the more visible the dust spots become --Ermell 09:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-01 02 ISLE OF INISHEER - IMO 9181091 arriving at Dover UK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The ship could be a bit sharper, but overall a nice shot! --Jay.Jarosz 19:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-01 01 ISLE OF INISHEER - IMO 9181091 arriving at Dover UK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Horizon is not level. I'm down to approve once this is fixed. --Jay.Jarosz 19:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. The ship and the horizon are on different perspective lines but I think I found the sweet spot. --GRDN711 16:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Nice so much better, thank you! --Jay.Jarosz 04:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isle of Inisheer – IMO 9181091.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-01 ROPAX ferry, ISLE OF INNISFREE - IMO 8908466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isle of Innisfree - IMO 8908466.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquaculture processing vessel, Taupiri - IMO 9854064 – starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-11-27 01 Tug, COOPER MORAN - IMO 9812547 - Savannah GA USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-11-27 02 Tug, COOPER MORAN - IMO 9812547 - Savannah GA USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-11-27 03 Tug, COOPER MORAN - IMO 9812547 - Savannah GA USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-18 TAUPIRI - IMO 9854064, near Kristiansund, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 20:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlantic Vision - IMO 9211509 – starboard (right side) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used, *But the ship could perhaps have been a bit sharper. --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
  
•  Comment @Agnes Monkelbaan: You have a valid point… I may have grabbed the wrong frame of this ship to upload the first time. Hopefully you will like this version better. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

• Much better now. Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cooper Moran - IMO 9812547.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
NACC Argonaut – starboard (right side) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-23 03 CCGS CAPE SPRY 825552 at Souris PEI Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Happy holidays! Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-05 NACC ARGONAUT - IMO 9287302 – Argentia, NL CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted CW --C messier 22:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @C messier: Struggled with the competing horizontal lines in this image to find the right balance but with the latest half a degree tilt correction, image seems to work better. --GRDN711 00:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC) The tilt is better, but the noise got significantly worse. --C messier 22:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @C messier: Went back and reviewed the change history for this image. Apparently Lightroom has a creative feature that can add grain to an image that looks like noise. This grain option was accidentally implemented in the last version along with tilt correction. Deleted image history and re-worked – see if tilt and noise are acceptable now. --GRDN711 01:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oratank - IMO 9336713 – starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-01 MS BREMEN - IMO 8907424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MS Arrow - IMO 9119414 – port view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-12 01 MS ARROW off Douglas, UK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too much of sky for me, but Good quality. --Cayambe 08:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-09-01 HMCS FREDERICK ROLETTE (AOPV 434) - IMO 4702541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I suggest to apply (selective) noise reduction especially on the sky. --Tuxyso 11:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)  Done and IMHO looks better. Thanks for the review. GRDN711 15:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC) MUCHbetter, QI now. --Tuxyso 08:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-08-15 01 Halifax Transit ferry, VINCENT COLEMAN - IMO 9850317 - Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-08-22 JOHN P. WRONOSKI - IMO 9337432 - New London CT USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John P. Wronowski - IMO 9337432.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amak Island Volcano, Alaska USA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Wrong ship name

Hi Gordon, det is not Sailor, I will rename this file today: . Det is Andrea, registered in Reykjavik. Ship lettering on the stern is clearly visible in this picture ANDREA REYKJAVIK. Why SAILOR? Thanks, PjotrMahh1 (talk) 04:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello PjotrMahh1 - thank you for your careful review of my image. You are right - the image is the wrong ship. Fortunately, I have another of the right "Sailor (ship, 1979)" and have uploaded that as a replacement. That should take care of the issue. All the other details are correct.

Thank you once again for your help on this. GRDN711 (talk) 13:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

• Well, but we need your photograph of Andrea, too (Andrea is missing now). Can you upload this file again? Can you tell me if the site Sailor (ship, 1979) was empty at the moment you have uploaded your photo. Hungarian ship Sailor, built in 1979, should have been there. Was the photograph deleted? Thank you, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Don't answer, I found these photos, and I know who did it. Det is absolut. Eine Katastrophe! See rules:
  • If there are several ships with the same name built in the same year, the place where the ship was built/location of the shipyard is added: "<name of ship> (ship, <year>, <place>)".

Sample: "Mistral (ship, 1999, Saint-Nazaire)" as there are several Mistral (ship, 1999). In the rare case that there are several ships with the same name built the same year at the same place, the yard number is also added: "<name of ship> (ship, <year>, <place>, <yard number>)". Sample: "Stena Transporter (ship, 1978, Ulsan, 649)" and Stena Transporter (ship, 1978, Ulsan, 651).

• • • Please, make new categories 'ship by name' properly: templates: italic title, IMOcat, Wikidata Infobox above, and categories in this order IMO, call sign, MMSI, Type of ship and country from, ship registered, ship by name (flat list) below. IMO cat - templates IMO, Wikidata Infobox above, and categories only: 'Ship built in yard' and 'Ship built in year', 'Ship scrapped in year', 'Ship scrapped in place', below. Don't write ship name cat there, thanks --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 00:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello PjotrMahh1:

"Well, but we need your photograph of Andrea, too (Andrea is missing now). Can you upload this file again?"

I will upload my image of Andrea shortly, but nothing is missing by my observation. There is an existing Andrea ship sub-Category:Andrea (ship, 1972), under parent category Category:IMO 7222231 with 5 images currently in it (mine will be the 6th). Everything seems fine.

I understand your comments concerning Commons organization of ships.

The sub-Category:Sailor (ship, 1979) was existing when I found it and placed correctly under the parent category - Category:IMO 7222231 as its universal identifying number.

Congratulations on resolving the issue of the 4 images of ships also named Sailor that were not tour boat SAILOR - IMO 7811240 by creating a new category for them.

Best,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 01:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

• Hello Gordon. Yes, it was another MV (motor vessel) Sailor, Moskva-class trip boat in Budapest, built in Moscow Yard (Soviet Union), in 1979 too. Thank you for two Andrea-photos reload of today (16.03.2024) because the one of them was removed by Sailor of 15 March 2024. Everything seems to be OK now. Best, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 10:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 10:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taifun - ENI 04301940.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-08-21 01 MV HIGHLANDERS - IMO 9331189 - Channel-Port aux Basques CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-23 SAILOR - IMO 7811240 - Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)  Support The corrected iimage is also good quality. --Tagooty 03:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MV Highlanders - IMO 933118.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-23 01 ANDREA - IMO 7222231 - Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-23 02 ANDREA - IMO 7222231 - Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but you should remove the spot in the sky (top left). --Velvet 07:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)  Done --GRDN711 02:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-17 01 MF HUSOY (HUSØY) - IMO 9663403 – Husøya, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-17 02 MF HUSOY (HUSØY) - IMO 9663403 – Husøya, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Ghost-Sniper (ship, 2005)

Following the change in scope Scope changed from Category:Oranda (ship, 2005) to Ghost-Sniper (ship, 2005) can you reconsider your previous vote. best regards. Pierre André ^(talk) 09:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

L'Eldorado - Péniche évènementielle (Lambersart)

Following the change in scope Scope changed from L'Eldorado - Péniche évènementielle (Lambersart) to L'Eldorado - Event barge (Lambersart) can you reconsider your previous vote. best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 09:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Laléa - Péniche évènementielle (Wambrechies)

Following the change in scope Scope changed from from Laléa - Péniche évènementielle (Wambrechies) to Laléa - Event barge (Wambrechies) - Event barge (Lambersart) can you reconsider your previous vote. best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 10:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrea - IMO 7041431.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-17 03 MF HUSOY (HUSØY) - IMO 9663403 – Husøya, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haines, Alaska USA – harbor and town view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haines, Alaska USA – harbor and town view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RORO ferry, Husøy - IMO 7041431.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RORO ferry, Husøy - IMO 7041431.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Your Rainbow Panorama (Ólafur Eliasson, 2006 - 2011) - ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark – installation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Done Added object location. Thank you, Archaeodontosaurus, for catching this. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC))
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 04:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Your Rainbow Panorama (Ólafur Eliasson, 2006 - 2011) - ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark – human interaction.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Done Checked image description and GPS coordinates are there. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 04:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Your Rainbow Panorama (Ólafur Eliasson, 2006 - 2011) - ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark – human interaction.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Done Checked image description and GPS coordinates are there. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 04:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Your Rainbow Panorama (Ólafur Eliasson, 2006 - 2011) - ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark – installation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Done Added object location. Thank you, Archaeodontosaurus, for catching this. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC))
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 04:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Your Rainbow Panorama (Ólafur Eliasson, 2006 - 2011) - ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark – human interaction.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Done Checked image description and GPS coordinates are there. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 04:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Your Rainbow Panorama (Ólafur Eliasson, 2006 - 2011) - ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark – installation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Done Added object location. Thank you, Archaeodontosaurus, for catching this. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC))
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 04:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-17 02 JERNOY (JERNØY) - IMO 9429766 - Husøya, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Coordinates, Spiekeroog and my image of Suaeda maritima

Hi GRDN711, I have owned a camera that provides GPS data only since late in August 2015 and I try to provide coordinates for most of my newer photos that are not from a guided tour. I upload as many of my plant photos to Commons as I can in my spare time and most of my photos taken between 2008 to 2023 are on Commons already. At the moment, most of my uploaded images (and most of my quality image candidates) are from 2007 and I have the intention to continue uploading earlier digital photos until I am either dead or disabled or until the earliest digital photos from 2002 are also on Commons, provided their quality is not too poor. There are hardly any coordinates for these. I cannot and I will not promise that I will always write something about the habitat to the description. There is a lot of metadata already and I am not a professional botanist.
Spiekeroog is one of the East Frisian Islands and basically a large pile of sand. The highest elevation is about 24 m above sea level, because sand dunes that are too high will erode. However, even if the sea level rises dramatically, these islands are unlikely to vanish because they will continue rising. The area between the island and the continent is muddy, the Wadden Sea, which should be only accessed accompanied by an experienced leader. The northern shore is mostly a lot of sandy beach. Suaeda maritima is a salt-tolerant species that grows in muddy, temporarily inundated areas. This is atypical for the northern shore, where I found it. However, there were some small areas that were sufficiently low to get flooded by tide and some tidal creeks. This plant grew on one of these muddy spots. The base of the photographed plant was still wet from sea water. Best wishes --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 23:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I just corrected my text. Spiekeroog is one of the East Frisian Islands, because it is German. The West Frisian Islands belong to the Netherlands. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello Robert:

Thank you for your query.

There are many bad images in Commons, and at some point Wikimedia Commons may reach the point when the cost of server space becomes an issue and Commons has to make hard decisions as to what media to keep online and what to toss or move to off-line storage.

To that end, when I see a good image come along in QI/FP/VI ratings, I like to make sure it is well-documented, including a possible home in Wikipedia article or some other Wiki, so that its value to the Wiki world is enhanced and it remains valued in Commons for a long, long time.

Your image of Suaeda maritima is not a pretty picture but perfectly illustrates the type of environment that this salt-tolerant species is found adn should be valued for this species.

While Commons generally encourages a one-line description during image upload, more can be added later. I was looking for just an extra sentence or two about the growing environment that your image was found in. As you wrote most eloquently to that point in your response above, I would just add the second paragraph - "Spiekeroog is one of…. still wet from sea water" to the image description. I would be happy to do this for your if you wish. Please let me know.

GPS coordinates associated by the photographer with plant and animal species images, add value to that image forever.

For adding GPS coordinates to an image, I use Lightroom for non-GPS images that lets me find the spot in a Google Maps page within Lightroom and record the GPS coordinates into the image meta data. The GPS coordinates get uploaded to Commons with the image and are automatically recorded in the image description.

If you don't have Lightroom or similar, this can be done manually using Google Maps online and the Commons location template. Using the internet version of Google Maps, find the location where you believe the image was taken (doesn't have to be perfect, just close). Click on the spot and Google will put a red pin there. Right click on the pin and Google lets you copy the GPS coordinates of the pin in decimal format to the clipboard. Then place the location at the bottom of the image description using the Location template.

Camera location	32° 04′ 50.93″ N, 81° 04′ 58.73″ W	View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap

(camera location in GPS coordinates - default.)

Object location	45° 34′ 09.98″ N, 10° 14′ 33.65″ E	View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap

(object location in GPS coordinates.)

REM: To geocode an uploaded Commons image, place GPS coordinates (5 decimal places only in decimal format) with a straight spacer ( | ) separator at the bottom of the image description. The image location can now be found in the Commons Map.

Hope this helps,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Deletion of files does not free any space on the servers, because nothing is really deleted. Deleted files are just hidden from ordinary users, not from administrators. I understand if someone nominates some of my images for deletion if they are really bad, but hardly because of lack of information. There are many images of organisms without any identification or even without a clue where in the world they were taken. Even these are generally kept, not deleted, though their usefulness may be rather questionable.
I have absolutely no problem adding coordinates to a Commons image and I know http://tools.freeside.sk/geolocator/geolocator.html, which is very useful IMO if I know an approximate location, but just adding wildly guessed coordinates does not make any sense in this case, except if I wanted to nominate the image for VI. I have not got Lightroom.
This is a wiki, not my private web page. So if something really important about this image is missing (not about the island), then please feel free to add this information. However, Commons is not an encyclopedia. The addition of large amounts of very general encyclopedic information is clearly not the purpose of a description. Therefore, please do not write all that basic stuff about the island to the description, because this should be on Wikipedia, not in the description of an image. My text above is just an explanation for you. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello Robert:

Totally agree on "There are many images of organisms without any identification or even without a clue where in the world they were taken."

Unless elements in the image can be identified visually, the image becomes almost worthless without further supporting identification for context. This case becomes more so as the years pass.

IMHO, particularly for animal and plant species that tend to be rather obscure, the following are needed:

· A well-chosen file name.

· Correct and complete categorization.

· A good verbal description.

· GPS coordinates, if possible.

For your image, using the more user-friendly Google Maps method took me about 15 seconds to get GPS coordinates of 53.78107 | 7.69976 for your image. As the originating photographer, you may be able to place the Google pin more precisely but lacking else, this method of adding GPS coordinates works to place the image within a few miles of exact location which is good enough. As I Google-searched on "Spiekeroog", there was no mix-up between West and East Friesen. GPS coordinates support a well-written word description of the image location.

I only make this case for images that I think have a long term future in Commons and Wikipedia. - Gordon Leggett GRDN711 (talk) 02:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

If I needed to add speculative coordinates that are accurate within less than a mile, I might chose something like 53.78028 | 7.72461 with template {{location estimated}}. However, at least in my opinion, this is no really necessary or even remotely useful information. I have no idea where you could find the plant now on the north beach in a similar habitat, except that I suspect that it might be far away in eastern direction. So let's agree to disagree on this one. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 07:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jernøy - IMO 9429766.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arctic RAM - IMO 7829120.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zim Kingston - IMO 9389693 – starboard side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used. Would you please straighten the horizon?--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you for the review and the keen observation. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-09-20 01 Wide view of Juneau, Alaska USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The ship also needs a category --Ermell 17:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)  : Done Thanks for the catch. --GRDN711 23:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC))  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Juneau, Alaska USA – waterfront.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-19 Damaged container ship, MV ZIM KINGSTON - IMO 9389693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grendelkhan 16:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-04-12 02 Tanerliq (TANERLIQ, TAN'ERLIQ, Tan'erliq) - IMO 9178381 - Port Angeles USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-04-12 01 Tanerliq (TANERLIQ, TAN'ERLIQ, Tan'erliq) - IMO 9178381 - Port Angeles USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd apply some denoising --Poco a poco 06:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)  Done Original file was JPG, not RAW, but noise has been improved. --GRDN711 19:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Better now. With RAW it's always easier, but in the meanwhile the processing tools do a decent job also with JPEGs --Poco a poco 07:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tugboat, Tanerliq - IMO 9178381.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)