Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mukri raba 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mukri raba 2.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2014 at 19:36:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created and uploaded by Vamps - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment I suggest to add a geocode for the camera location. --Slaunger (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)- Comment Could be brightened a little. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 05:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 11:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Non-descript landscape with no real subject. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)- Support conspicuous wild landscape. Nice light, I like it. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The landscape is very descriptive and you don't always need a "real subject" in landscape photo. But the panorama is slightly distorted. Left side goes up and it's so obvious I don't understand why you can't see it. Should be easy to fix. --193.110.198.7 17:24, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Descriptive of what? The bush in the front? The unfeatured lone tree on the right? The two cut off ponds? Of course an image doesn't always have to be descriptive, but in this case, since there is nothing to feature, it should have been. Nothing in this image draws you in. In fact I would say the elements actualy drag you to the sides. Even if I were to concede the light is nice, which I don't, you'd still be left with nice light on an ill advised composition. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Comment One more thing. The sky is darker in the middle. That's what happens when you use one of the auto exposure modes instead of manual in photographing panorama. --193.110.198.7 17:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Just a remark - your conclusion about using auto exposure modes is wrong. Exposure was in manual mode for all pictures used for making this panorama. Darker sky in the middle of the panorama is caused by the polarizing filter. --Vamps (talk) 07:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Using a polarising filter for a panoramic angle of view is usually a bad idea for that very reason... Diliff (talk) 14:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the light on the vegetation is good, but the exposure control on the sky is bad. The landscape is interesting, but I do not see a clear idea with the composition. --Slaunger (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Saffron Blaze. Nikhil (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose dark sky. -- -donald- (talk) 08:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
